R语言广义线性模型索赔频率预测：过度分散风险暴露数和树状图可视化
Posted tecdat
tags:
篇首语：本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理，主要介绍了R语言广义线性模型索赔频率预测：过度分散风险暴露数和树状图可视化相关的知识，希望对你有一定的参考价值。
?
原文链接：http://tecdat.cn/?p=13963
在精算科学和保险费率制定中，考虑到风险敞口可能是一场噩梦。不知何故，简单的结果是因为计算起来更加复杂，只是因为我们必须考虑到暴露是一个异构变量这一事实。
保险费率制定中的风险敞口可以看作是审查数据的问题（在我的数据集中，风险敞口始终小于1，因为观察结果是合同，而不是保单持有人），利息变量是未观察到的变量，因为我们必须为保险合同定价一年（整年）的保险期。因此，我们必须对保险索赔的年度频率进行建模。
?
在我们的数据集中，我们考虑索赔总数与总风险承担比率。例如，如果我们考虑泊松过程，可能性是
?
即
?
因此，我们有一个预期值的估算，一个自然估算 。
现在，我们需要估算方差，更准确地说是条件变量。
这可以用来检验泊松假设是否对频率建模有效。考虑以下数据集，
> nombre=rbind(nombre1,nombre2)
> baseFREQ = merge(contrat,nombre)在这里，我们确实有两个感兴趣的变量，即每张合约的敞口，
> E <- baseFREQ$exposition和（观察到的）索赔数量（在该时间段内）
> Y <- baseFREQ$nbre无需协变量，可以计算每个合同的平均（每年）索赔数量以及相关的方差
> (mean=weighted.mean(Y/E,E))
[1] 0.07279295
> (variance=sum((Y-mean*E)^2)/sum(E))
[1] 0.08778567看起来方差（略）大于平均值（我们将在几周后看到如何更正式地对其进行测试）。可以在保单持有人居住的地区添加协变量，例如人口密度，
Density, zone 11 average = 0.07962411 variance = 0.08711477
Density, zone 21 average = 0.05294927 variance = 0.07378567
Density, zone 22 average = 0.09330982 variance = 0.09582698
Density, zone 23 average = 0.06918033 variance = 0.07641805
Density, zone 24 average = 0.06004009 variance = 0.06293811
Density, zone 25 average = 0.06577788 variance = 0.06726093
Density, zone 26 average = 0.0688496 variance = 0.07126078
Density, zone 31 average = 0.07725273 variance = 0.09067
Density, zone 41 average = 0.03649222 variance = 0.03914317
Density, zone 42 average = 0.08333333 variance = 0.1004027
Density, zone 43 average = 0.07304602 variance = 0.07209618
Density, zone 52 average = 0.06893741 variance = 0.07178091
Density, zone 53 average = 0.07725661 variance = 0.07811935
Density, zone 54 average = 0.07816105 variance = 0.08947993
Density, zone 72 average = 0.08579731 variance = 0.09693305
Density, zone 73 average = 0.04943033 variance = 0.04835521
Density, zone 74 average = 0.1188611 variance = 0.1221675
Density, zone 82 average = 0.09345635 variance = 0.09917425
Density, zone 83 average = 0.04299708 variance = 0.05259835
Density, zone 91 average = 0.07468126 variance = 0.3045718
Density, zone 93 average = 0.08197912 variance = 0.09350102
Density, zone 94 average = 0.03140971 variance = 0.04672329可以可视化该信息
> plot(meani,variancei,cex=sqrt(Ei),col="grey",pch=19,
+ xlab="Empirical average",ylab="Empirical variance")
> points(meani,variancei,cex=sqrt(Ei))
?
圆圈的大小与组的大小有关（面积与组内的总暴露量成正比）。第一个对角线对应于泊松模型，即方差应等于均值。也可以考虑其他协变量
?
或汽车品牌，
?
也可以将驾驶员的年龄视为分类变量
?
让我们更仔细地看一下不同年龄段的人，
?
在右边，我们可以观察到年轻的（没有经验的）驾驶员。那是预料之中的。但是有些类别 低于 第一个对角线：期望的频率很大，但方差不大。也就是说，我们 可以肯定的 是，年轻的驾驶员会发生更多的车祸。相反，它不是一个异类：年轻的驾驶员可以看作是一个相对同质的类，发生车祸的频率很高。
使用原始数据集（在这里，我仅使用具有50,000个客户的子集），我们确实获得了以下图形：
?
由于圈正在从18岁下降到25岁，因此具有明显的经验影响。
同时我们可以发现有可能将曝光量视为标准变量，并查看系数实际上是否等于1。如果没有任何协变量，
Call:
glm(formula = Y ~ log(E), family = poisson("log"))
Deviance Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.3988 -0.3388 -0.2786 -0.1981 12.9036
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) -2.83045 0.02822 -100.31 <2e-16 ***
log(E) 0.53950 0.02905 18.57 <2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
(Dispersion parameter for poisson family taken to be 1)
Null deviance: 12931 on 49999 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 12475 on 49998 degrees of freedom
AIC: 16150
Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 6也就是说，该参数显然严格小于1。它与重要性均不相关，
Linear hypothesis test
Hypothesis:
log(E) = 1
Model 1: restricted model
Model 2: Y ~ log(E)
Res.Df Df Chisq Pr(>Chisq)
1 49999
2 49998 1 251.19 < 2.2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1我也没有考虑协变量，
Deviance Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.7114 -0.3200 -0.2637 -0.1896 12.7104
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) -14.07321 181.04892 -0.078 0.938042
log(exposition) 0.56781 0.03029 18.744 < 2e-16 ***
carburantE -0.17979 0.04630 -3.883 0.000103 ***
as.factor(ageconducteur)19 12.18354 181.04915 0.067 0.946348
as.factor(ageconducteur)20 12.48752 181.04902 0.069 0.945011因此，假设暴露是此处的外生变量可能是一个过强的假设。
接下来我们开始讨论建模索赔频率时的过度分散。在前面，我讨论了具有不同暴露程度的经验方差的计算。但是我只使用一个因素来计算类。当然，可以使用更多的因素。例如，使用因子的笛卡尔积，
Class D A (17,24] average = 0.06274415 variance = 0.06174966
Class D A (24,40] average = 0.07271905 variance = 0.07675049
Class D A (40,65] average = 0.05432262 variance = 0.06556844
Class D A (65,101] average = 0.03026999 variance = 0.02960885
Class D B (17,24] average = 0.2383109 variance = 0.2442396
Class D B (24,40] average = 0.06662015 variance = 0.07121064
Class D B (40,65] average = 0.05551854 variance = 0.05543831
Class D B (65,101] average = 0.0556386 variance = 0.0540786
Class D C (17,24] average = 0.1524552 variance = 0.1592623
Class D C (24,40] average = 0.0795852 variance = 0.09091435
Class D C (40,65] average = 0.07554481 variance = 0.08263404
Class D C (65,101] average = 0.06936605 variance = 0.06684982
Class D D (17,24] average = 0.1584052 variance = 0.1552583
Class D D (24,40] average = 0.1079038 variance = 0.121747
Class D D (40,65] average = 0.06989518 variance = 0.07780811
Class D D (65,101] average = 0.0470501 variance = 0.04575461
Class D E (17,24] average = 0.2007164 variance = 0.2647663
Class D E (24,40] average = 0.1121569 variance = 0.1172205
Class D E (40,65] average = 0.106563 variance = 0.1068348
Class D E (65,101] average = 0.1572701 variance = 0.2126338
Class D F (17,24] average = 0.2314815 variance = 0.1616788
Class D F (24,40] average = 0.1690485 variance = 0.1443094
Class D F (40,65] average = 0.08496827 variance = 0.07914423
Class D F (65,101] average = 0.1547769 variance = 0.1442915
Class E A (17,24] average = 0.1275345 variance = 0.1171678
Class E A (24,40] average = 0.04523504 variance = 0.04741449
Class E A (40,65] average = 0.05402834 variance = 0.05427582
Class E A (65,101] average = 0.04176129 variance = 0.04539265
Class E B (17,24] average = 0.1114712 variance = 0.1059153
Class E B (24,40] average = 0.04211314 variance = 0.04068724
Class E B (40,65] average = 0.04987117 variance = 0.05096601
Class E B (65,101] average = 0.03123003 variance = 0.03041192
Class E C (17,24] average = 0.1256302 variance = 0.1310862
Class E C (24,40] average = 0.05118006 variance = 0.05122782
Class E C (40,65] average = 0.05394576 variance = 0.05594004
Class E C (65,101] average = 0.04570239 variance = 0.04422991
Class E D (17,24] average = 0.1777142 variance = 0.1917696
Class E D (24,40] average = 0.06293331 variance = 0.06738658
Class E D (40,65] average = 0.08532688 variance = 0.2378571
Class E D (65,101] average = 0.05442916 variance = 0.05724951
Class E E (17,24] average = 0.1826558 variance = 0.2085505
Class E E (24,40] average = 0.07804062 variance = 0.09637156
Class E E (40,65] average = 0.08191469 variance = 0.08791804
Class E E (65,101] average = 0.1017367 variance = 0.1141004
Class E F (17,24] average = 0 variance = 0
Class E F (24,40] average = 0.07731177 variance = 0.07415932
Class E F (40,65] average = 0.1081142 variance = 0.1074324
Class E F (65,101] average = 0.09071118 variance = 0.1170159同样，可以将方差与平均值作图，
> plot(vm,vv,cex=sqrt(ve),col="grey",pch=19,
+ xlab="Empirical average",ylab="Empirical variance")
> points(vm,vv,cex=sqrt(ve))
> abline(a=0,b=1,lty=2)
?
一种替代方法是使用树。树可以从其他变量获得，但它应该是相当接近我们理想的模型。在这里，我确实使用了整个数据库（超过60万行）
树如下
> plot(T)
> text(T)
?
现在，每个分支都定义了一个类，可以使用它来定义一个类。应该被认为是同质的。
Class 6 average = 0.04010406 variance = 0.04424163
Class 8 average = 0.05191127 variance = 0.05948133
Class 9 average = 0.07442635 variance = 0.08694552
Class 10 average = 0.4143646 variance = 0.4494002
Class 11 average = 0.1917445 variance = 0.1744355
Class 15 average = 0.04754595 variance = 0.05389675
Class 20 average = 0.08129577 variance = 0.0906322
Class 22 average = 0.05813419 variance = 0.07089811
Class 23 average = 0.06123807 variance = 0.07010473
Class 24 average = 0.06707301 variance = 0.07270995
Class 25 average = 0.3164557 variance = 0.2026906
Class 26 average = 0.08705041 variance = 0.108456
Class 27 average = 0.06705214 variance = 0.07174673
Class 30 average = 0.05292652 variance = 0.06127301
Class 31 average = 0.07195285 variance = 0.08620593
Class 32 average = 0.08133722 variance = 0.08960552
Class 34 average = 0.1831559 variance = 0.2010849
Class 39 average = 0.06173885 variance = 0.06573939
Class 41 average = 0.07089419 variance = 0.07102932
Class 44 average = 0.09426152 variance = 0.1032255
Class 47 average = 0.03641669 variance = 0.03869702
Class 49 average = 0.0506601 variance = 0.05089276
Class 50 average = 0.06373107 variance = 0.06536792
Class 51 average = 0.06762947 variance = 0.06926191
Class 56 average = 0.06771764 variance = 0.07122379
Class 57 average = 0.04949142 variance = 0.05086885
Class 58 average = 0.2459016 variance = 0.2451116
Class 59 average = 0.05996851 variance = 0.0615773
Class 61 average = 0.07458053 variance = 0.0818608
Class 63 average = 0.06203737 variance = 0.06249892
Class 64 average = 0.07321618 variance = 0.07603106
Class 66 average = 0.07332127 variance = 0.07262425
Class 68 average = 0.07478147 variance = 0.07884597
Class 70 average = 0.06566728 variance = 0.06749411
Class 71 average = 0.09159605 variance = 0.09434413
Class 75 average = 0.03228927 variance = 0.03403198
Class 76 average = 0.04630848 variance = 0.04861813
Class 78 average = 0.05342351 variance = 0.05626653
Class 79 average = 0.05778622 variance = 0.05987139
Class 80 average = 0.0374993 variance = 0.0385351
Class 83 average = 0.06721729 variance = 0.07295168
Class 86 average = 0.09888492 variance = 0.1131409
Class 87 average = 0.1019186 variance = 0.2051122
Class 88 average = 0.05281703 variance = 0.0635244
Class 91 average = 0.08332136 variance = 0.09067632
Class 96 average = 0.07682093 variance = 0.08144446
Class 97 average = 0.0792268 variance = 0.08092019
Class 99 average = 0.1019089 variance = 0.1072126
Class 100 average = 0.1018262 variance = 0.1081117
Class 101 average = 0.1106647 variance = 0.1151819
Class 103 average = 0.08147644 variance = 0.08411685
Class 104 average = 0.06456508 variance = 0.06801061
Class 107 average = 0.1197225 variance = 0.1250056
Class 108 average = 0.0924619 variance = 0.09845582
Class 109 average = 0.1198932 variance = 0.1209162在这里，当根据索赔的经验平均值绘制经验方差时，我们得到
?
在这里，我们可以识别剩余异质性的类。
以上是关于R语言广义线性模型索赔频率预测：过度分散风险暴露数和树状图可视化的主要内容，如果未能解决你的问题，请参考以下文章
R语言广义线性模型Logistic回归模型C Statistics计算
R语言广义线性模型函数GLMglm函数构建逻辑回归模型（Logistic regression）构建仿真数据集控制所有其它预测变量进而评估单个预测因子对结果概率的影响
R语言mgcv包中的gam函数拟合广义加性模型（Generalized Additive Model)GAM（对非线性变量进行样条处理计算RMSER方调整R方可视化模型预测值与真实值的曲线）