「经济学人」Totting up bitcoin’s environmental costs
Posted 英语主播皮卡丘
tags:
篇首语：本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理，主要介绍了「经济学人」Totting up bitcoin’s environmental costs相关的知识，希望对你有一定的参考价值。
经济学人杂志《The Economist》几乎是所有英语考试的题源，包括考研、四六级、专四专八、高考、NECCS、CATTI翻译、托福雅思、上海市中高级口译等。如果能熟读并深刻理解《The Economist》每一篇文章的主旨和态度，那么几乎等于提前掌握了这些考试的出题方向。
无注释原文
Totting up bitcoin’s environmental costs
As coinbase’s Ipo shows, crypto currencies have many fans. But they have detractors, too. Environmentalists, in particular, fret about how much energy bitcoin uses.
In a paper in Nature Communications, a group of academics led by Dabo Guan of Tsinghua University and Shouyang Wang at the Chinese Academy of Sciences examine bitcoin’s energy use in China.
They conclude that, in the absence of legal curbs, bitcoin could by 2024 become a “non-negligible” barrier to China’s efforts to decarbonise its economy.
Bitcoin’s hunger for energy stems from its design. It forgoes centralised record-keeping in favour of a “blockchain”, a transaction database that is distributed among users.
The block chain is maintained by “miners”, who validate transactions by competing to crack mathematical puzzles with solutions that are hard to find but easy to check. Each successfully mined block of transactions generates a reward, currently 6.25 bitcoins ($357,000).
The system varies the difficulty of the puzzles to ensure that one new block is created, on average, every ten minutes. High bitcoin prices make it worthwhile to spend more computing power—and therefore electricity—chasing mining rewards.
But bitcoin’s automatic stabilisers will ramp up the mathematical difficulty in response. Like the Red Queen in “Through the Looking-Glass”, competing miners find themselves running faster simply to stand still.
Despite the currency’s democratic ambitions, mining is concentrated among a handful of professional operators. About 70% takes place in China. The researchers use economic modelling to try to work out how much carbon all this make-work produces.
They conclude that, without regulation, Chinese bitcoin mining could consume around as much energy as Italy or Saudi Arabia by 2024. Annual carbon emissions, at 130m tonnes, would approach those of Nigeria.
Such numbers should be taken with a good deal of salt. Bitcoin’s energy use depends crucially on its price, which swings wildly. The authors assume that the long-term trend will be upward, because the rate at which new bitcoins are created is designed to halve every four years.
Reality will doubtless prove more complicated. But the general picture—that bitcoin is a dirty business—fits with other research. One oft-cited model, which uses publicly available blockchain data, reckons its global energy consumption is already equal to that of Kazakhstan, and that its carbon footprint matches Hong Kong’s.
以上是关于「经济学人」Totting up bitcoin’s environmental costs的主要内容，如果未能解决你的问题，请参考以下文章