npm:何时使用 `--force` 和 `--legacy-peer-deps`
Posted
技术标签:
【中文标题】npm:何时使用 `--force` 和 `--legacy-peer-deps`【英文标题】:npm: When to use `--force` and `--legacy-peer-deps` 【发布时间】:2021-05-07 06:56:30 【问题描述】:我是 npm 新手,正在尝试了解重新创建 node_modules
目录以进行部署的工作原理。
我们使用npm ci
而不是npm install
来确保部署过程中的干净状态。但是,当我们在没有任何标志的情况下运行它时,会出现以下错误:
修复上游依赖冲突,或使用--force 或--legacy-peer-deps 重试此命令以接受不正确(且可能损坏)的依赖解析。
npm install
的 documentation 如下(npm ci
的 @ 上没有标志987654322@):
-f 或 --force 参数将强制 npm 获取远程资源,即使磁盘上存在本地副本。
同时,--legacy-peer-deps
的文档说:
--legacy-peer-deps:安装时忽略所有peerDependencies,采用npm 4到6的风格。
似乎这两个标志都会让npm ci
生成node_modules
目录没有任何问题,但我仍然不清楚两者之间的区别。
据我了解,--force
听起来像是基于最后下载的依赖项,并将覆盖任何以前下载的依赖项。同时,--legacy-peer-deps
听起来它在安装过程中总是会跳过对等依赖项(无论是什么),即使没有问题。
这两个标志有什么区别,我们应该什么时候使用它们?
【问题讨论】:
【参考方案1】:当项目出现 NPM 版本冲突和错误提示时。
错误
An unhandled exception occurred: The 'buildOptimizer' option cannot be used without 'aot'.
在 .npmrc 文件中
legacy-peer-deps true
命令提示符
npm install
【讨论】:
【参考方案2】:在新版本的 npm (v7) 中,默认情况下,npm install
在遇到冲突 peerDependencies 时会失败。以前不是这样的。
查看here 了解有关 npm v7 中对等依赖项的更多信息。
两者的区别如下-
--legacy-peer-deps
:安装时忽略所有peerDependencies,采用npm 4到6的风格。
--strict-peer-deps
:遇到任何冲突的peerDependencies 时失败并中止安装过程。默认情况下,npm 只会在根项目的直接依赖引起的 peerDependencies 冲突时崩溃。
【讨论】:
每个 OP 的--force
是什么?是否有一个优于另一个或整体重复数据包等的性能优势?【参考方案3】:
在https://github.blog/2021-02-02-npm-7-is-now-generally-available/的文章中
您可以选择使用
--force
重试以绕过冲突或--legacy-peer-deps
命令完全忽略对等依赖项 (此行为类似于版本 4-6)。
我同意这句话不是很清楚,但是“完全忽略对等依赖项”听起来不太好。让我们用一个真实的例子:
这是我npm install
时遇到的peer依赖错误:
npm ERR! code ERESOLVE
npm ERR! ERESOLVE unable to resolve dependency tree
npm ERR!
npm ERR! While resolving: mobile@undefined
npm ERR! Found: react@17.0.1
npm ERR! node_modules/react
npm ERR! react@"17.0.1" from the root project
npm ERR! peer react@">=16.0.0" from @testing-library/react-native@7.2.0
npm ERR! node_modules/@testing-library/react-native
npm ERR! dev @testing-library/react-native@"7.2.0" from the root project
npm ERR!
npm ERR! Could not resolve dependency:
npm ERR! peer react@"16.13.1" from react-native@0.63.2
npm ERR! node_modules/react-native
npm ERR! react-native@"https://github.com/expo/react-native/archive/sdk-39.0.4.tar.gz" from the root project
npm ERR! peer react-native@">=0.59" from @testing-library/react-native@7.2.0
npm ERR! node_modules/@testing-library/react-native
npm ERR! dev @testing-library/react-native@"7.2.0" from the root project
npm ERR!
npm ERR! Fix the upstream dependency conflict, or retry
npm ERR! this command with --force, or --legacy-peer-deps
npm ERR! to accept an incorrect (and potentially broken) dependency resolution.
npm ERR!
npm ERR! See /Users/me/.npm/eresolve-report.txt for a full report.
npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR! /Users/me/.npm/_logs/2021-03-13T00_10_33_813Z-debug.log
npm ERR! code 1
npm ERR! path /Users/me/my-app
npm ERR! command failed
npm ERR! command sh -c sh ./bin/setup.sh
npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR! /Users/me/.npm/_logs/2021-03-13T00_10_33_860Z-debug.log
下面是--legacy-peer-deps
和--force
之间的package-lock.json区别。
-
如果我运行
npm install --legacy-peer-deps
,它会将其添加到我的 package-lock.json:
"node_modules/@unimodules/react-native-adapter":
"version": "5.7.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@unimodules/react-native-adapter/-/react-native-adapter-5.7.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L557/+sc8ZKJVgo1734HF1QNCxrt/fpqdmdNgySJT+kErux/AJNfPq3flsK0fyJduVmniTutYIMyW48cFoPKDA==",
"dependencies":
"invariant": "^2.2.4",
"lodash": "^4.5.0"
,
"peerDependencies":
"react-native": "*",
"react-native-web": "~0.13.7"
,
...
"@unimodules/react-native-adapter":
"version": "5.7.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@unimodules/react-native-adapter/-/react-native-adapter-5.7.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L557/+sc8ZKJVgo1734HF1QNCxrt/fpqdmdNgySJT+kErux/AJNfPq3flsK0fyJduVmniTutYIMyW48cFoPKDA==",
"requires":
"invariant": "^2.2.4",
"lodash": "^4.5.0"
,
-
如果我改用
npm install --force
,它会添加
"node_modules/expo/node_modules/@unimodules/react-native-adapter":
"version": "5.7.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@unimodules/react-native-adapter/-/react-native-adapter-5.7.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L557/+sc8ZKJVgo1734HF1QNCxrt/fpqdmdNgySJT+kErux/AJNfPq3flsK0fyJduVmniTutYIMyW48cFoPKDA==",
"dependencies":
"invariant": "^2.2.4",
"lodash": "^4.5.0"
,
"peerDependencies":
"react-native": "*",
"react-native-web": "~0.13.7"
,
"node_modules/expo/node_modules/inline-style-prefixer":
"version": "5.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/inline-style-prefixer/-/inline-style-prefixer-5.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-PYUF+94gDfhy+LsQxM0g3d6Hge4l1pAqOSOiZuHWzMvQEGsbRQ/ck2WioLqrY2ZkHyPgVUXxn+hrkF7D6QUGbA==",
"peer": true,
"dependencies":
"css-in-js-utils": "^2.0.0"
,
"node_modules/expo/node_modules/react-native-web":
"version": "0.13.18",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/react-native-web/-/react-native-web-0.13.18.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WR/0ECAmwLQ2+2cL2Ur+0/swXFAtcSM0URoADJmG6D4MnY+wGc91JO8LoOTlgY0USBOY+qG/beRrjFa+RAuOiA==",
"peer": true,
"dependencies":
"array-find-index": "^1.0.2",
"create-react-class": "^15.6.2",
"deep-assign": "^3.0.0",
"fbjs": "^1.0.0",
"hyphenate-style-name": "^1.0.3",
"inline-style-prefixer": "^5.1.0",
"normalize-css-color": "^1.0.2",
"prop-types": "^15.6.0",
"react-timer-mixin": "^0.13.4"
,
"peerDependencies":
"react": ">=16.5.1",
"react-dom": ">=16.5.1"
,
...
"dependencies":
"@unimodules/react-native-adapter":
"version": "5.7.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@unimodules/react-native-adapter/-/react-native-adapter-5.7.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-L557/+sc8ZKJVgo1734HF1QNCxrt/fpqdmdNgySJT+kErux/AJNfPq3flsK0fyJduVmniTutYIMyW48cFoPKDA==",
"requires":
"invariant": "^2.2.4",
"lodash": "^4.5.0"
,
"inline-style-prefixer":
"version": "5.1.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/inline-style-prefixer/-/inline-style-prefixer-5.1.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-PYUF+94gDfhy+LsQxM0g3d6Hge4l1pAqOSOiZuHWzMvQEGsbRQ/ck2WioLqrY2ZkHyPgVUXxn+hrkF7D6QUGbA==",
"peer": true,
"requires":
"css-in-js-utils": "^2.0.0"
,
"react-native-web":
"version": "0.13.18",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/react-native-web/-/react-native-web-0.13.18.tgz",
"integrity": "sha512-WR/0ECAmwLQ2+2cL2Ur+0/swXFAtcSM0URoADJmG6D4MnY+wGc91JO8LoOTlgY0USBOY+qG/beRrjFa+RAuOiA==",
"peer": true,
"requires":
"array-find-index": "^1.0.2",
"create-react-class": "^15.6.2",
"deep-assign": "^3.0.0",
"fbjs": "^1.0.0",
"hyphenate-style-name": "^1.0.3",
"inline-style-prefixer": "^5.1.0",
"normalize-css-color": "^1.0.2",
"prop-types": "^15.6.0",
"react-timer-mixin": "^0.13.4"
,
如您所见,npm install --force
仍然固定了许多更严格的依赖版本。
因此,对于 npm 7,如果 npm install
由于对等依赖问题而失败,您可能会首先尝试 npm install --force
。
【讨论】:
当我使用yarn
而不是npm install
时,它似乎没有出现任何错误,并且它安装软件包而不提示任何错误?使用yarn
代替npm
有什么问题吗?
这是npm
特有的
我不太明白,--legacy-peer-deps
只是没有安装任何对等依赖项?以上是关于npm:何时使用 `--force` 和 `--legacy-peer-deps`的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章
获取:npm WARN 使用 --force 禁用推荐的保护
即使在 npm clean cache --force、unlink、rm -rf node_modules 等之后,NPM 链接也会继续拉旧版本
npm install issue:27 个漏洞(16 个中等,9 个高,2 个严重)要解决所有问题,运行:npm audit fix --force