哲学家进餐问题 - 只有 2 个线程有效
Posted
技术标签:
【中文标题】哲学家进餐问题 - 只有 2 个线程有效【英文标题】:Dining philosophers problem - only 2 thread worked 【发布时间】:2020-05-05 23:01:09 【问题描述】:我正在尝试解决dining philosophers problem。
就我而言,每个哲学家都应该吃 1,000,000 次。 问题是它似乎只有“1”并且“3”吃完了。 我正在使用带有临界区锁的线程,这是我的代码:
CRITICAL_SECTION ghCARITICALSection1;
CRITICAL_SECTION ghCARITICALSection2;
CRITICAL_SECTION ghCARITICALSection3;
CRITICAL_SECTION ghCARITICALSection4;
CRITICAL_SECTION ghCARITICALSection5;
DWORD WINAPI func(int* phiphilosopher)
if (1 == *phiphilosopher && TryEnterCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection1) && TryEnterCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection2))
std::cout << "1 is eating...\n";
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
i = i;
LeaveCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection1);
LeaveCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection2);
if (2 == *phiphilosopher && TryEnterCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection2) && TryEnterCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection3))
std::cout << "2 is eating...\n";
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
LeaveCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection2);
LeaveCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection3);
if (3 == *phiphilosopher && TryEnterCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection3) && TryEnterCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection4))
std::cout << "3 is eating...\n";
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
LeaveCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection3);
LeaveCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection4);
//...also for 4,5
return 0;
int philosopher1 = 1;
int* philosopher1ptr = &philosopher1;
int philosopher2 = 2;
int* philosopher2ptr = &philosopher2;
//...Also for philosopher 3,4,5
InitializeCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection1);
InitializeCriticalSection(&ghCARITICALSection2);
//...aslo for ghCARITICALSection 3,4,5
HANDLE WINAPI th1 = CreateThread(NULL, 0, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)func, philosopher1ptr, 0, NULL);
HANDLE WINAPI th2 = CreateThread(NULL, 0, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)func, philosopher2ptr, 0, NULL);
////...aslo for th3,4,5
WaitForSingleObject(th1, INFINITE);
WaitForSingleObject(th2, INFINITE);
//...also for th3,4,5
每位哲学家必须交替思考和进食。然而,哲学家只有在左右叉子都有的情况下才能吃意大利面。每个叉子只能由一个哲学家持有,因此只有在另一位哲学家不使用叉子时,哲学家才能使用叉子。
【问题讨论】:
想想如果您的TryEnterCriticalSection
调用之一失败会发生什么,以及在什么情况下会发生这种情况。
【参考方案1】:
想想这里的逻辑
if (TryEnterCriticalSection(&a) && TryEnterCriticalSection(&b))
// . . .
LeaveCriticalSection(&a);
LeaveCriticalSection(&b);
如果TryEnterCriticalSection(&a)
成功而TryEnterCriticalSection(&b)
失败会发生什么; CS a
永远保持进入状态。
它应该看起来像
if (TryEnterCriticalSection(&a))
if (TryEnterCriticalSection(&b))
// . . .
LeaveCriticalSection(&b);
LeaveCriticalSection(&a);
【讨论】:
以上是关于哲学家进餐问题 - 只有 2 个线程有效的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章