关闭 AF_PACKET 与 AF_INET 的时间差?
Posted
技术标签:
【中文标题】关闭 AF_PACKET 与 AF_INET 的时间差?【英文标题】:Time difference of closing AF_PACKET vs AF_INET? 【发布时间】:2019-05-21 10:41:56 【问题描述】:关闭创建为AF_PACKET
和AF_INET
的套接字之间的时间差的原因是什么?如何减少AF_PACKET
的关闭时间?
sockfd = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW);
close(sockfd); // 60000 μs
sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW);
close(sockfd); // 30 μs
重现行为的代码:
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <net/if.h>
int main()
struct timeval time_start, time_end;
int sockfd;
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW)) == -1)
perror("socket error");
gettimeofday(&time_start, NULL);
close(sockfd);
gettimeofday(&time_end, NULL);
printf("close AF_PACKET: %ld \n", (time_end.tv_sec*1000000 + time_end.tv_usec) - (time_start.tv_sec*1000000 + time_start.tv_usec));
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW)) == -1)
perror("socket error");
gettimeofday(&time_start, NULL);
close(sockfd);
gettimeofday(&time_end, NULL);
printf("close AF_INET: %ld \n", (time_end.tv_sec*1000000 + time_end.tv_usec) - (time_start.tv_sec*1000000 + time_start.tv_usec));
return 0;
【问题讨论】:
无法复制;如果你展示一个完整的测试用例会有所帮助。 @mosvy ,我粘贴了源代码以重现该行为。 RPi 和笔记本电脑也有同样的问题。 用 linux 3.4.52 试过:`close AF_PACKET: 168 close AF_INET: 94` 使用 linux 4.4.34:close AF_PACKET: 324 close AF_INET: 91
.
【参考方案1】:
两个 close 系统调用在逻辑上没有显着差异
如果我像下面这样更改您的程序,
`
int main()
struct timeval time_start, time_end;
int sockfd;
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW)) == -1)
perror("socket error");
gettimeofday(&time_start, NULL);
close(sockfd);
gettimeofday(&time_end, NULL);
printf("close AF_INET: %ld \n", (time_end.tv_sec*1000000 + time_end.tv_usec) - (time_start.tv_sec*1000000 + time_start.tv_usec));
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW)) == -1)
perror("socket error");
gettimeofday(&time_start, NULL);
close(sockfd);
gettimeofday(&time_end, NULL);
printf("close AF_PACKET: %ld \n", (time_end.tv_sec*1000000 + time_end.tv_usec) - (time_start.tv_sec*1000000 + time_start.tv_usec));
return 0;
`
我看到的结果是
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 3471
close AF_PACKET: 4
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 8
close AF_PACKET: 7
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 8
close AF_PACKET: 6
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 8
close AF_PACKET: 5
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 9
close AF_PACKET: 5
同样的,如果我改变如下,
int main()
struct timeval time_start, time_end;
int sockfd;
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW)) == -1)
perror("socket error");
gettimeofday(&time_start, NULL);
close(sockfd);
gettimeofday(&time_end, NULL);
printf("close AF_INET: %ld \n", (time_end.tv_sec*1000000 + time_end.tv_usec) - (time_start.tv_sec*1000000 + time_start.tv_usec));
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW)) == -1)
perror("socket error");
gettimeofday(&time_start, NULL);
close(sockfd);
gettimeofday(&time_end, NULL);
printf("close AF_INET: %ld \n", (time_end.tv_sec*1000000 + time_end.tv_usec) - (time_start.tv_sec*1000000 + time_start.tv_usec));
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW)) == -1)
perror("socket error");
gettimeofday(&time_start, NULL);
close(sockfd);
gettimeofday(&time_end, NULL);
printf("close AF_PACKET: %ld \n", (time_end.tv_sec*1000000 + time_end.tv_usec) - (time_start.tv_sec*1000000 + time_start.tv_usec));
return 0;
结果如下,
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 6
close AF_INET: 3
close AF_PACKET: 3
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 8
close AF_INET: 4
close AF_PACKET: 5
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 8
close AF_INET: 4
close AF_PACKET: 4
shahul@shahul-VirtualBox:~/test$ ./a.out
close AF_INET: 8
close AF_INET: 4
close AF_PACKET: 4
结论: 基本上,第一次近距离通话需要更多时间, 可能需要时间来映射第一次关闭系统调用函数。
【讨论】:
感谢您的回复。不幸的是,我无法确认我的设备:Raspberry Pi (Raspbian 9.4. 4.14.17) 和笔记本电脑 (Ubuntu 17.04, 4.10.0)。即使经过多次开闭循环,收盘时间差异也保持不变。以上是关于关闭 AF_PACKET 与 AF_INET 的时间差?的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章
使用ctypes和python并调用libc accept时的EFAULT