减少非空开关盒的数量
Posted
技术标签:
【中文标题】减少非空开关盒的数量【英文标题】:Reduce the number of non-empty switch cases 【发布时间】:2021-11-26 13:31:00 【问题描述】:有没有办法像 SonarQube 所说的那样?在 reducer 文件中,一个 switch 中有 37 个 case,但 SonarQube 只允许 30 个。
也许可以用不同的方式编写我的代码,因为它运行良好,问题只是 SonarQube 像 CodeSmell 一样返回它。我在下面发布了我的减速器代码。
export function equipmentReducer(
lastState: IEquipmentState = new EquipmentState(),
action: GenericAction<EquipmentActionTypes, any>
): IEquipmentState
switch (action.type)
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_EQUIPMENT:
return reducerUtils.requestListData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment[]>(lastState, ['equipmentList']);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT:
return reducerUtils.receiveListData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment[]>(lastState, ['equipmentList'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT:
return reducerUtils.errorListData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment[]>(lastState, ['equipmentList'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_EQUIPMENT_BY_ID:
return reducerUtils.requestItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(lastState, ['selectedEquipment']);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT_BY_ID:
return reducerUtils.receiveItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(
lastState,
['selectedEquipment'],
action.payload as IEquipment
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT_BY_ID:
return reducerUtils.errorItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(lastState, ['selectedEquipment'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_ADD_EQUIPMENT:
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_UPDATE_EQUIPMENT:
return reducerUtils.requestPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(
lastState,
['selectedEquipment'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_ADD_EQUIPMENT:
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_UPDATE_EQUIPMENT:
return reducerUtils.receivePostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(
lastState,
['selectedEquipment'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_ADD_EQUIPMENT:
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_UPDATE_EQUIPMENT:
return reducerUtils.errorPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(
lastState,
['selectedEquipment'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_INITIAL_SPECIFICATION:
return reducerUtils.requestListData<IEquipmentState, IEquipmentInitialSpecification[]>(lastState, [
'equipmentInitialSpecification',
]);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_INITIAL_SPECIFICATION:
return reducerUtils.receiveListData<IEquipmentState, IEquipmentInitialSpecification[]>(
lastState,
['equipmentInitialSpecification'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_INITIAL_SPECIFICATION:
return reducerUtils.errorListData<IEquipmentState, IEquipmentInitialSpecification[]>(
lastState,
['equipmentInitialSpecification'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_MANUFACTURERS:
return reducerUtils.requestListData<IEquipmentState, IManufacturersListItem[]>(lastState, [
'manufacturers',
'manufacturerList',
]);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_MANUFACTURERS:
return reducerUtils.receiveListData<IEquipmentState, IManufacturersListItem[]>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'manufacturerList'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_RECEIVE_MANUFACTURERS:
return reducerUtils.errorListData<IEquipmentState, IManufacturersListItem[]>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'manufacturerList'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_SUPPLIERS:
return reducerUtils.requestListData<IEquipmentState, ISuppliersListItem[]>(lastState, [
'suppliers',
'supplierList',
]);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_SUPPLIERS:
return reducerUtils.receiveListData<IEquipmentState, ISuppliersListItem[]>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'supplierList'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_RECEIVE_SUPPLIERS:
return reducerUtils.errorListData<IEquipmentState, ISuppliersListItem[]>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'supplierList'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_ADD_MANUFACTURER:
return reducerUtils.requestPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IManufacturer>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'selectedManufacturer', 'manufacturerInfo'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_ADD_MANUFACTURER:
return reducerUtils.receivePostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IManufacturer>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'selectedManufacturer', 'manufacturerInfo'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_ADD_MANUFACTURER:
return reducerUtils.errorPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IManufacturer>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'selectedManufacturer', 'manufacturerInfo'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_ADD_SUPPLIER:
return reducerUtils.requestPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, ISupplier>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'selectedSupplier', 'supplierInfo'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_ADD_SUPPLIER:
return reducerUtils.receivePostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, ISupplier>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'selectedSupplier', 'supplierInfo'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_ADD_SUPPLIER:
return reducerUtils.errorPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, ISupplier>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'selectedSupplier', 'supplierInfo'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_ADD_MANUFACTURER_CONTACT:
return reducerUtils.requestPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IContact>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'selectedManufacturer', 'selectedContact'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_ADD_MANUFACTURER_CONTACT:
return reducerUtils.receivePostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IContact>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'selectedManufacturer', 'selectedContact'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_ADD_MANUFACTURER_CONTACT:
return reducerUtils.errorPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IContact>(
lastState,
['manufacturers', 'selectedManufacturer', 'selectedContact'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_ADD_SUPPLIER_CONTACT:
return reducerUtils.requestPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IContact>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'selectedSupplier', 'selectedContact'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_ADD_SUPPLIER_CONTACT:
return reducerUtils.receivePostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IContact>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'selectedSupplier', 'selectedContact'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_ADD_SUPPLIER_CONTACT:
return reducerUtils.errorPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IContact>(
lastState,
['suppliers', 'selectedSupplier', 'selectedContact'],
action.payload
);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_EQUIPMENT_DELETE:
return reducerUtils.requestPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(lastState, ['deletedEquipment'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT_DELETE:
return reducerUtils.receivePostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(lastState, ['deletedEquipment'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT_DELETE:
return reducerUtils.errorPostPutItemData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment>(lastState, ['deletedEquipment'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_EQUIPMENT_IS_DELETED:
return requestItemData<IEquipmentState, boolean>(lastState, ['equipmentIsDeleted']);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT_IS_DELETED:
return receiveItemData<IEquipmentState, boolean>(lastState, ['equipmentIsDeleted'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.ERROR_RECEIVE_EQUIPMENT_IS_DELETED:
return errorItemData<IEquipmentState, boolean>(lastState, ['equipmentIsDeleted'], action.payload);
case EquipmentActionTypes.RESET_STATE:
return resetSelectedEquipmentState(lastState);
default:
return lastState;
【问题讨论】:
请分享您的代码 @depperm 我分享了它。 您可以编辑 sonarqube 的规则或创建自己的规则吗? @depperm 不,我不是。EquipmentActionTypes
字符串、整数等的值是什么?
【参考方案1】:
我相信你可以通过寻找共同的回报和创建地图来减少它。例如,reducerUtils.requestListData
被调用了 5 次,通过为差异创建地图,您应该能够摆脱 4 个 switch 案例。
最初的想法是把共享返回函数的action.types
变成一个新的map(myMap
)键并在这里列出具体的不同参数(我使用option1
和option2
,因为我不知道其余代码)。使用option1
的替代方法是将其更改为unknown
或|
(IEquipment[] | IEq....
) 在<>
内的可能性列表
const myMap =
[EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_EQUIPMENT]:
option1: IEquipment[],
option2: ['equipmentList']
,
[EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_INITIAL_SPECIFICATION]:
option1: IEquipmentInitialSpecification[],
option2: ['equipmentInitialSpecification']
,
[EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_INITIAL_SPECIFICATION]:
option1: IEquipmentInitialSpecification[],
option2: [
'equipmentInitialSpecification',
]
,
[EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_MANUFACTURERS]:
option1: IManufacturersListItem[],
option2: [
'manufacturers',
'manufacturerList',
]
,
[EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_SUPPLIERS]:
option1: ISuppliersListItem[],
option2: [
'suppliers',
'supplierList',
]
switch (action.type)
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_INITIAL_SPECIFICATION:
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_MANUFACTURERS:
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_SUPPLIERS:
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_INITIAL_SPECIFICATION:
case EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_EQUIPMENT:
// alternatively instead of option1 ..... , unknown >
// alternatively instead of option1 ..... , IEquipment[] | IEq.... >
return reducerUtils.requestListData < IEquipmentState, myMap[action.type].option1 > (lastState, myMap[action.type].option2);
继续上面的想法,应该可以将函数移动到option1
并完全删除开关盒。相关article或this one
const myMap =
[EquipmentActionTypes.REQUEST_EQUIPMENT]:
option1: reducerUtils.requestListData<IEquipmentState, IEquipment[] >(),
option2: ['equipmentList']
,
...
myMap[action.type].option1(lastState, myMap[action.type].option2, actionPayload)
【讨论】:
这不起作用。我已经使用 NgRX 中的 combineReducers 解决了这个问题,方法是将大减速器分成两个较小的减速器。 @simpller 什么没用?它有错误吗?是不是把switch case的数量减少得不够多? 无法从 myMap 数组中获取类型 您是否尝试过替代方案:未知或|
我已经用 NgRx 的 combineReducers 修复了这个问题以上是关于减少非空开关盒的数量的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章