dplyr:inner_join 与部分字符串匹配
Posted
技术标签:
【中文标题】dplyr:inner_join 与部分字符串匹配【英文标题】:dplyr: inner_join with a partial string match 【发布时间】:2015-12-31 02:07:09 【问题描述】:如果数据框y
中的seed
列与x
中的string
列部分匹配,我想加入两个数据框。这个例子应该说明:
# What I have
x <- data.frame(idX=1:3, string=c("Motorcycle", "TractorTrailer", "Sailboat"))
y <- data_frame(idY=letters[1:3], seed=c("ractor", "otorcy", "irplan"))
x
idX string
1 1 Motorcycle
2 2 TractorTrailer
3 3 Sailboat
y
Source: local data frame [3 x 2]
idY seed
(chr) (chr)
1 a ractor
2 b otorcy
3 c irplan
# What I want
want <- data.frame(idX=c(1,2), idY=c("b", "a"), string=c("Motorcycle", "TractorTrailer"), seed=c("otorcy", "ractor"))
want
idX idY string seed
1 1 b Motorcycle otorcy
2 2 a TractorTrailer ractor
也就是说,类似
inner_join(x, y, by=stringr::str_detect(x$string, y$seed))
【问题讨论】:
我实际上是在尝试将一个数据帧中较长的核苷酸序列与另一个数据帧中的 miRNA 种子序列进行匹配。也许 Bioconductor Biostrings 包更有效,但不确定是否跨不同数据框加入。 问题的实际大小? # 种子/字符串和每个的长度? 嗨@MartinMorgan。在数据帧 X 中大约 10,000 个“字符串”(PAR-CLIP 簇序列)的测试用例中,并在数据帧 Y 中测试到大约 100 个“种子”(miRNA 反向互补种子序列),我在答案中使用的解决方案下面花了几分钟。慢,但可以忍受。实际大小可能高达 30,000 个字符串和 1000 个种子(30,000,000 行完全连接!)。我查看了 BioStrings,但无法让这些与 dplyr tbl/data.frames 很好地配合使用。 Dplyr 也不能很好地处理 DataFrame 对象。 【参考方案1】:您也可以将 base-r 与此功能一起使用(稍微改编自此答案:https://***.com/a/34723496/3048453,它使用 dplyr 将列绑定在一起,如果您不想使用 dplyr,请使用 cbind
):
partial_join <- function(x, y, by_x, pattern_y)
idx_x <- sapply(y[[pattern_y]], grep, x[[by_x]])
idx_y <- sapply(seq_along(idx_x), function(i) rep(i, length(idx_x[[i]])))
df <- dplyr::bind_cols(x[unlist(idx_x), , drop = F],
y[unlist(idx_y), , drop = F])
return(df)
用你的例子
x <- data.frame(idX=1:3, string=c("Motorcycle", "TractorTrailer", "Sailboat"))
y <- data_frame(idY=letters[1:3], seed=c("ractor", "otorcy", "irplan"))
df_merged <- partial_join(x, y, by_x = "string", pattern_y = "seed")
df_merged
# # A tibble: 2 × 4
# idX string idY seed
# <int> <chr> <chr> <chr>
# 1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
# 2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
速度基准:
功能
library(dplyr)
x <- data_frame(idX=1:3, string=c("Motorcycle", "TractorTrailer", "Sailboat"))
y <- data_frame(idY=letters[1:3], seed=c("ractor", "otorcy", "irplan"))
partial_join <- function(x, y, by_x, pattern_y)
idx_x <- sapply(y[[pattern_y]], grep, x[[by_x]])
idx_y <- sapply(seq_along(idx_x), function(i) rep(i, length(idx_x[[i]])))
df <- dplyr::bind_cols(x[unlist(idx_x), , drop = F],
y[unlist(idx_y), , drop = F])
return(df)
partial_join(x, y, by_x = "string", pattern_y = "seed")
#> # A tibble: 2 × 4
#> idX string idY seed
#> <int> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
#> 2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
joran <- function(x, y, by_x, pattern_y)
library(dplyr)
my_db <- src_sqlite(path = tempfile(), create= TRUE)
x_tbl <- copy_to(dest = my_db, df = x)
y_tbl <- copy_to(dest = my_db, df = y)
result <- tbl(my_db,
sql(sprintf("select * from x, y where x.%s like '%%' || y.%s || '%%'", by_x, pattern_y)))
collect(result, n = Inf)
joran(x, y, "string", "seed")
#> # A tibble: 2 × 4
#> idX string idY seed
#> <int> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
#> 2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
stephen <- function(x, y, by_x, pattern_y)
library(dplyr)
d <- full_join(mutate(x, i=1),
mutate(y, i=1), by = "i")
# quoting issue here, defaulting to base-r
d$take <- stringr::str_detect(d[[by_x]], d[[pattern_y]])
d %>%
filter(take == T) %>%
select(-i, -take)
stephen(x, y, "string", "seed")
#> # A tibble: 2 × 4
#> idX string idY seed
#> <int> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
#> 2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
feng <- function(x, y, by_x, pattern_y)
library(fuzzyjoin)
by_string <- pattern_y
names(by_string) <- by_x
regex_inner_join(x, y, by = by_string)
feng(x, y, "string", "seed")
#> # A tibble: 2 × 4
#> idX string idY seed
#> <int> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
#> 2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
基准测试
library(microbenchmark)
res <- microbenchmark(
joran(x, y, "string", "seed"),
stephen(x, y, "string", "seed"),
feng(x, y, "string", "seed"),
partial_join(x, y, "string", "seed")
)
res
#> Unit: microseconds
#> expr min lq mean
#> joran(x, y, "string", "seed") 18953.008 20099.0540 21641.6646
#> stephen(x, y, "string", "seed") 1320.161 1456.9415 1704.9218
#> feng(x, y, "string", "seed") 5187.366 5625.8825 6926.2336
#> partial_join(x, y, "string", "seed") 190.264 222.0055 257.7906
#> median uq max neval cld
#> 20675.5855 21827.764 70707.324 100 c
#> 1579.8925 1670.719 9676.176 100 a
#> 5842.8150 6065.530 107961.805 100 b
#> 242.0735 283.870 523.649 100 a
set.seed(123123)
x_large <- x %>% sample_n(1000, replace = T)
y_large <- y %>% sample_n(1000, replace = T)
res_large <- microbenchmark(
joran(x_large, y_large, "string", "seed"),
# stephen(x_large, y_large, "string", "seed"),
feng(x_large, y_large, "string", "seed"),
partial_join(x_large, y_large, "string", "seed")
)
res_large
#> Unit: milliseconds
#> expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld
#> joran(x_large, y_large, "string", "seed") 321.03631 324.49262 334.2760 329.13991 335.30185 368.1153 10 c
#> feng(x_large, y_large, "string", "seed") 88.00369 89.85744 103.8686 93.84477 97.69121 200.0473 10 a
#> partial_join(x_large, y_large, "string", "seed") 286.01533 286.78024 290.6295 288.89405 291.79887 303.4524 10 b
【讨论】:
第二个基准测试有错误;它在基准测试res_large
时使用原始(小)x
和y
,这就是为什么时间与res
相同的原因。当我用x_large
和y_large
替换它时,它显示冯的解决方案(fuzzyjoin)快了大约5 倍。我怀疑这是因为fuzzyjoin 效率更高(尤其是在唯一值很少时),但在小型数据集上的开销更大
@DavidRobinson,感谢您指出!我已经更正了数字和帖子。【参考方案2】:
fuzzyjoin
库有两个函数 regex_inner_join
和 fuzzy_inner_join
允许您匹配部分字符串:
x <- data.frame(idX=1:3, string=c("Motorcycle", "TractorTrailer", "Sailboat"))
y <- data.frame(idY=letters[1:3], seed=c("ractor", "otorcy", "irplan"))
x$string = as.character(x$string)
y$seed = as.character(y$seed)
library(fuzzyjoin)
x %>% regex_inner_join(y, by = c(string = "seed"))
idX string idY seed
1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
library(stringr)
x %>% fuzzy_inner_join(y, by = c("string" = "seed"), match_fun = str_detect)
idX string idY seed
1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
【讨论】:
为了在大型表上获得更好的性能,您可以使用stringi
包中的 match_fun = stri_detect_fixed
。
请注意,str_detect 将期望 string, pattern
而不是 pattern, string
【参考方案3】:
我不知道这将如何处理更大的数据,但它(或其变体)可能值得一试:
library(dplyr)
x <- data.frame(idX=1:3, string=c("Motorcycle", "TractorTrailer", "Sailboat"))
y <- data_frame(idY=letters[1:3], seed=c("ractor", "otorcy", "irplan"))
my_db <- src_sqlite(path = tempfile(),create= TRUE)
x_tbl <- copy_to(dest = my_db,df = x)
y_tbl <- copy_to(dest = my_db,df = y)
result <- tbl(my_db,sql("select * from x,y where x.string like '%' || y.seed || '%'"))
> collect(result)
Source: local data frame [2 x 4]
idX string idY seed
(int) (chr) (chr) (chr)
1 1 Motorcycle b otorcy
2 2 TractorTrailer a ractor
我也无法说明它的性能在不同数据库中的差异。对于这种查询,postgres 或 mysql 可能会更好或更差。
【讨论】:
【参考方案4】:这行得通,但在大型数据集上会非常慢。
x <- data.frame(idX=1:3, string=c("Motorcycle", "TractorTrailer", "Sailboat"))
y <- data_frame(idY=letters[1:3], seed=c("ractor", "otorcy", "irplan"))
library(dplyr)
full_join(mutate(x, i=1),
mutate(y, i=1)) %>%
select(-i) %>%
filter(str_detect(string, seed))
【讨论】:
以上是关于dplyr:inner_join 与部分字符串匹配的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章
如何在 R 中 dplyr::inner_join 多个 tbls 或 data.frames
为啥 data.table 的 inner_join 行为不同?
R语言dplyr包进行dataframe的连接(inner_joinleft_joinright_joinfull_joinsemi_joinanti_join)操作实战