http://www.sohu.com/a/111814313_479818
又是一年新年到，群众们喜闻乐见的排名又刷新了！各个咨询玩家们之间的排名发生了怎么样的此消彼长？大家一定很好奇吧！此次智选君选择了北美、欧洲及亚太三个区域分开排名，数据提供方仍然来自Vault.com，主要选择了声望、战略咨询、管理咨询、IT咨询及人力资源咨询等维度进行数据汇总分析。
点评：毫无悬念的MBB成为北美地区最具声望的咨询公司Top3（好多好多年了...），而Big4血统的咨询公司仍然延续着过去几年的强势，值得关注的是IBM GBS掉出了前十，大概是认知技术发展的缘故吧～
点评：毕业小朋友们最憧憬的”高大上“的战略咨询，在北美区毫无悬念...MBB的得票率甩开第四名德勤50%以上
点评：整体还是MBB PK Big4，偶尔有几个Tier 2刷刷存在感...
点评：IT咨询领域，IBM最近比较动荡...貌似和A记的分差在拉大，不知道认知计算的战略是不是可以帮大象重夺第一？Booz Allen Hamilton国内见的比较少，但是在米帝是政府的主要IT承包商...把米帝的互联网监控捅出来的爱德华·斯诺登就是该公司的雇员。
点评：德勤，麦肯锡，埃森哲，BCG在这一块都有很强的实力，挤的Hay不要不要的...
点评：看到了罗兰贝格的回归，相较于北美地区的业务迟迟打不开局面，作为自身大本营的欧洲地区还是稳居在最具声望的咨询公司之列。而Big4在欧洲的咨询声望与北美还是存在一定的差距。当然MBB还是MBB...
点评：同样作为少数几个源自欧洲的战略咨询公司，罗兰贝格在欧洲地区获得了仅次于MBB的认可程度。但是即便如此，在得票率上MBB仍然遥遥领先于罗兰贝格。
点评：又是MBB...和Big4...为嘛要说又？
点评：A记战略业务最近各种挖挖挖，貌似屯了不少MBB和RB的Par，据说要砸钱砸出一个新世界。
最具声望的咨询公司的排名方法（来自Vault）：
Survey respondents were asked to rate each consulting firm in the survey on a scale from 1 to 10 based on prestige, with 10 being the most prestigious. Consultants were unable to rate their own firm, and they were asked to rate only those firms with which they were familiar.
Vault collected the survey results and averaged the score for each firm. The firms were then ranked, with the highest score being No. 1, down to No. 50.
Remember that Vault‘s top-50 prestigious consulting firms are chosen by practicing consultants at top consulting firms. Vault does not choose or influence these rankings. The rankings measure perceived prestige (as determined by consulting professionals) and not revenue, size or lifestyle.
各个细分行业排名方法（来自Vault）：
Vault asked consultants to rank the best firms in several areas of business focus. Consultants were allowed to vote for up to three firms as the best in each area, but could NOT vote for their own firm.
此外，在每一张排名表里面都出现的玩家是：麦肯锡，波士顿和德勤，恭喜恭喜！