回答审稿人意见

Posted 2020-09-09

Dear Editor,
We are very grateful to your helpful comments and suggestions. We thank the anonymous
reviewers who provided useful suggestions for improving the quality of our manuscript. I am
pleased to reply to you that we have thoroughly revised our manuscript considering all the
reviewers‘ comments and suggestions, so that the quality of the manuscript has been improved
significantly.
Here, we attached a summary of our major changes in the revision.
1. We have revised to make the manuscript more readable and concise. We xed unclear
statements and some grammatical problems.
2. According to the reviewers‘ suggestions, we have added biological evidence to explain
the relationship between our method and brain science in Introduction(pp.1).
3. We reduced the part of ORB method description and added new materials to describe
advantages of ORB in Visual Processing(pp.2-3).
4. We have revised to clearly state the experiment parameters of our visual process method
in 5.1 Feature Extraction(pp.6).
5. Finally, we have made detailed responses to address the concerns of Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2, respectively.

Regards,

 

============================================