Using the EventManager

Posted 云旗

tags:

篇首语：本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理，主要介绍了Using the EventManager相关的知识，希望对你有一定的参考价值。

Using the EventManager

This tutorial explores the features of zend-eventmanager in-depth.

Terminology

  • An Event is a named action.
  • A Listener is any php callback that reacts to an event.
  • An EventManager aggregates listeners for one or more named events, andtriggers events.

Typically, an event will be modeled as an object, containing metadata surrounding when and how it was triggered, including the event name, what object triggered the event (the "target"), and what parameters were provided. Events are named, which allows a single listener to branch logic based on the event.

Getting started

The minimal things necessary to start using events are:

  • An EventManager instance
  • One or more listeners on one or more events
  • A call to trigger() an event

A basic example looks something like this:

use Zend\EventManager\EventManager;

$events = new EventManager();
$events->attach(‘do‘, function ($e) {
    $event = $e->getName();
    $params = $e->getParams();
    printf(
        ‘Handled event "%s", with parameters %s‘,
        $event,
        json_encode($params)
    );
});

$params = [‘foo‘ => ‘bar‘, ‘baz‘ => ‘bat‘];
$events->trigger(‘do‘, null, $params);

The above will result in the following:

Handled event "do", with parameters {"foo":"bar","baz":"bat"}

Closures are not required

Throughout this tutorial, we use closures as listeners. However, any valid PHP callback can be attached as a listeners: PHP function names, static class methods, object instance methods, functors, or closures. We use closures within this post for illustration only.

Event instances

trigger() is useful as it will create a Zend\EventManager\Event instance for you. You may want to create such an instance manually; for instance, you may want to re-use the same event instance to trigger multiple events, or you may want to use a custom instance.

Zend\EventManager\Event, which is the shipped event type and the one used by the EventManager by default has a constructor that accepts the same three arguments passed to trigger():

use Zend\EventManager\Event;

$event = new Event(‘do‘, null, $params);

When you have an instance available, you will use a different EventManagermethod to trigger the event: triggerEvent(). As an example:

$events->triggerEvent($event);

Event targets

If you were paying attention to the first example, you will have noted the nullsecond argument both when calling trigger() as well as creating an Eventinstance. Why is it there?

Typically, you will compose an EventManager within a class, to allow triggering actions within methods. The middle argument to trigger() is the "target", and in the case described, would be the current object instance. This gives event listeners access to the calling object, which can often be useful.

use Zend\EventManager\EventManager;
use Zend\EventManager\EventManagerAwareInterface;
use Zend\EventManager\EventManagerInterface;

class Example implements EventManagerAwareInterface
{
    protected $events;

    public function setEventManager(EventManagerInterface $events)
    {
        $events->setIdentifiers([
            __CLASS__,
            get_class($this)
        ]);
        $this->events = $events;
    }

    public function getEventManager()
    {
        if (! $this->events) {
            $this->setEventManager(new EventManager());
        }
        return $this->events;
    }

    public function doIt($foo, $baz)
    {
        $params = compact(‘foo‘, ‘baz‘);
        $this->getEventManager()->trigger(__FUNCTION__, $this, $params);
    }

}

$example = new Example();

$example->getEventManager()->attach(‘doIt‘, function($e) {
    $event  = $e->getName();
    $target = get_class($e->getTarget()); // "Example"
    $params = $e->getParams();
    printf(
        ‘Handled event "%s" on target "%s", with parameters %s‘,
        $event,
        $target,
        json_encode($params)
    );
});

$example->doIt(‘bar‘, ‘bat‘);

The above is basically the same as the first example. The main difference is that we‘re now using that middle argument in order to pass the target, the instance of Example, on to the listeners. Our listener is now retrieving that ($e->getTarget()), and doing something with it.

If you‘re reading this critically, you should have a new question: What is the call to setIdentifiers() for?

Shared managers

One aspect that the EventManager implementation provides is an ability to compose a SharedEventManagerInterface implementation.

Zend\EventManager\SharedEventManagerInterface describes an object that aggregates listeners for events attached to objects with specific identifiers. It does not trigger events itself. Instead, an EventManager instance that composes aSharedEventManager will query the SharedEventManager for listeners on identifiers it‘s interested in, and trigger those listeners as well.

How does this work, exactly?

Consider the following:

use Zend\EventManager\SharedEventManager;

$sharedEvents = new SharedEventManager();
$sharedEvents->attach(‘Example‘, ‘do‘, function ($e) {
    $event  = $e->getName();
    $target = get_class($e->getTarget()); // "Example"
    $params = $e->getParams();
    printf(
        ‘Handled event "%s" on target "%s", with parameters %s‘,
        $event,
        $target,
        json_encode($params)
    );
});

This looks almost identical to the previous example; the key difference is that there is an additional argument at the start of the list, ‘Example‘. This code is saying, "Listen to the ‘do‘ event of the ‘Example‘ target, and, when notified, execute this callback."

This is where the setIdentifiers() argument of EventManager comes into play. The method allows passing a string, or an array of strings, defining the name or names of the context or targets the given instance will be interested in. If an array is given, then any listener on any of the targets given will be notified.

So, getting back to our example, let‘s assume that the above shared listener is registered, and also that the Example class is defined as above. We can then execute the following:

$example = new Example();
$example->getEventManager()->setSharedManager($sharedEvents);
$example->do(‘bar‘, ‘bat‘);

and expect the following to be echo‘d:

Handled event "do" on target "Example", with parameters {"foo":"bar","baz":"bat"}

Now, let‘s say we extended Example as follows:

class SubExample extends Example
{
}

One interesting aspect of our setEventManager() method is that we defined it to listen both on __CLASS__ and get_class($this). This means that calling do()on our SubExample class would also trigger the shared listener! It also means that, if desired, we could attach to specifically SubExample, and listeners attached to only the Example target would not be triggered.

Finally, the names used as contexts or targets need not be class names; they can be some name that only has meaning in your application if desired. As an example, you could have a set of classes that respond to "log" or "cache" — and listeners on these would be notified by any of them.

Use class names as identifiers

We recommend using class names, interface names, and/or abstract class names for identifiers. This makes determining what events are available easier, as well as finding which listeners might be attaching to those events. Interfaces make a particularly good use case, as they allow attaching to a group of related classes a single operation.

At any point, if you do not want to notify shared listeners, pass a null value tosetSharedManager():

$events->setSharedManager(null);

and they will be ignored. If at any point, you want to enable them again, pass the SharedEventManager instance:

$events->setSharedManager($sharedEvents);

Wildcards

So far, with both a normal EventManager instance and with theSharedEventManager instance, we‘ve seen the usage of string event and string target names to which we want to attach. What if you want to attach a listener to multiple events or targets?

The answer is to supply an array of events or targets, or a wildcard, *.

Consider the following examples:

// Multiple named events:
$events->attach(
    [‘foo‘, ‘bar‘, ‘baz‘], // events
    $listener
);

// All events via wildcard:
$events->attach(
    ‘*‘, // all events
    $listener
);

// Multiple named targets:
$sharedEvents->attach(
    [‘Foo‘, ‘Bar‘, ‘Baz‘], // targets
    ‘doSomething‘, // named event
    $listener
);

// All targets via wildcard
$sharedEvents->attach(
    ‘*‘, // all targets
    ‘doSomething‘, // named event
    $listener
);

// Mix and match: multiple named events on multiple named targets:
$sharedEvents->attach(
    [‘Foo‘, ‘Bar‘, ‘Baz‘], // targets
    [‘foo‘, ‘bar‘, ‘baz‘], // events
    $listener
);

// Mix and match: all events on multiple named targets:
$sharedEvents->attach(
    [‘Foo‘, ‘Bar‘, ‘Baz‘], // targets
    ‘*‘, // events
    $listener
);

// Mix and match: multiple named events on all targets:
$sharedEvents->attach(
    ‘*‘, // targets
    [‘foo‘, ‘bar‘, ‘baz‘], // events
    $listener
);

// Mix and match: all events on all targets:
$sharedEvents->attach(
    ‘*‘, // targets
    ‘*‘, // events
    $listener
);

The ability to specify multiple targets and/or events when attaching can slim down your code immensely.

Wildcards can cause problems

Wildcards, while they simplify listener attachment, can cause some problems. First, the listener must either be able to accept any incoming event, or it must have logic to branch based on the type of event, the target, or the event parameters. This can quickly become difficult to manage.

Additionally, there are performance considerations. Each time an event is triggered, it loops through all attached listeners; if your listener cannot actually handle the event, but was attached as a wildcard listener, you‘re introducing needless cycles both in aggregating the listeners to trigger, and by handling the event itself.

We recommend being specific about what you attach a listener to, in order to prevent these problems.

Listener aggregates

Another approach to listening to multiple events is via a concept of listener aggregates, represented by Zend\EventManager\ListenerAggregateInterface. Via this approach, a single class can listen to multiple events, attaching one or more instance methods as listeners.

This interface defines two methods, attach(EventManagerInterface $events)and detach(EventManagerInterface $events). You pass an EventManagerinstance to one and/or the other, and then it‘s up to the implementing class to determine what to do.

The trait Zend\EventManager\ListenerAggregateTrait defines a $listenersproperty and common logic for detaching an aggregate‘s listeners. We‘ll use that to demonstrate creating an aggregate logging listener:

use Zend\EventManager\EventInterface;
use Zend\EventManager\EventManagerInterface;
use Zend\EventManager\ListenerAggregateInterface;
use Zend\EventManager\ListenerAggregateTrait;
use Zend\Log\Logger;

class LogEvents implements ListenerAggregateInterface
{
    use ListenerAggregateTrait;

    private $log;

    public function __construct(Logger $log)
    {
        $this->log = $log;
    }

    public function attach(EventManagerInterface $events)
    {
        $this->listeners[] = $events->attach(‘do‘, [$this, ‘log‘]);
        $this->listeners[] = $events->attach(‘doSomethingElse‘, [$this, ‘log‘]);
    }

    public function log(EventInterface $e)
    {
        $event  = $e->getName();
        $params = $e->getParams();
        $this->log->info(sprintf(‘%s: %s‘, $event, json_encode($params)));
    }
}

Attach the aggregate by passing it an event manager instance:

$logListener = new LogEvents($logger);
$logListener->attach($events);

Any events the aggregate attaches to will then be notified when triggered.

Why bother? For a couple of reasons:

  • Aggregates allow you to have stateful listeners. The above example demonstrates this via the composition of the logger; another example would be tracking configuration options.
  • Aggregates make detaching listeners easier, as you can detach all listeners a class defines at once.

Introspecting results

Sometimes you‘ll want to know what your listeners returned. One thing to remember is that you may have multiple listeners on the same event; the interface for results must be consistent regardless of the number of listeners.

The EventManager implementation by default returns aZend\EventManager\ResponseCollection instance. This class extends PHP‘sSplStack, allowing you to loop through responses in reverse order (since the last one executed is likely the one you‘re most interested in). It also implements the following methods:

  • first() will retrieve the first result received
  • last() will retrieve the last result received
  • contains($value) allows you to test all values to see if a given one was received, and returns a boolean true if found, and false if not.
  • stopped() will return a boolean value indicating whether or not a short-circuit occured; more on this in the next section.

Typically, you should not worry about the return values from events, as the object triggering the event shouldn‘t really have much insight into what listeners are attached. However, sometimes you may want to short-circuit execution if interesting results are obtained. (zend-mvc uses this feature to check for listeners returning responses, which are then returned immediately.)

Short-circuiting listener execution

You may want to short-circuit execution if a particular result is obtained, or if a listener determines that something is wrong, or that it can return something quicker than the target.

As examples, one rationale for adding an EventManager is as a caching mechanism. You can trigger one event early in the method, returning if a cache is found, and trigger another event late in the method, seeding the cache.

The EventManager component offers two ways to handle this, depending on whether you have an event instance already, or want the event manager to create one for you.

  • triggerEventUntil(callable $callback, EventInterface $event)
  • triggerUntil(callable $callback, $eventName, $target = null, $argv = [])

In each case, $callback will be any PHP callable, and will be passed the return value from the most recently executed listener. The $callback must then return a boolean value indicating whether or not to halt execution; booleantrue indicates execution should halt.

Your consuming code can then check to see if execution was short-circuited by using the stopped() method of the returned ResponseCollection.

Here‘s an example:

public function someExpensiveCall($criteria1, $criteria2)
{
    $params  = compact(‘criteria1‘, ‘criteria2‘);
    $results = $this->getEventManager()->triggerUntil(
        function ($r) {
            return ($r instanceof SomeResultClass);
        },
        __FUNCTION__, 
        $this, 
        $params
    );

    if ($results->stopped()) {
        return $results->last();
    }

    // ... do some work ...
}

With this paradigm, we know that the likely reason of execution halting is due to the last result meeting the test callback criteria; as such, we return that last result.

The other way to halt execution is within a listener, acting on the Event object it receives. In this case, the listener calls stopPropagation(true), and theEventManager will then return without notifying any additional listeners.

$events->attach(‘do‘, function ($e) {
    $e->stopPropagation();
    return new SomeResultClass();
});

This, of course, raises some ambiguity when using the trigger paradigm, as you can no longer be certain that the last result meets the criteria it‘s searching on. As such, we recommend that you standardize on one approach or the other.

Keeping it in order

On occasion, you may be concerned about the order in which listeners execute. As an example, you may want to do any logging early, to ensure that if short-circuiting occurs, you‘ve logged; if implementing a cache, you may want to return early if a cache hit is found, and execute late when saving to a cache.

Each of EventManager::attach() and SharedEventManager::attach() accept one additional argument, a priority. By default, if this is omitted, listeners get a priority of 1, and are executed in the order in which they are attached. However, if you provide a priority value, you can influence order of execution.

  • Higher priority values execute earlier.
  • Lower (negative) priority values execute later.

To borrow an example from earlier:

$priority = 100;
$events->attach(‘Example‘, ‘do‘, function($e) {
    $event  = $e->getName();
    $target = get_class($e->getTarget()); // "Example"
    $params = $e->getParams();
    printf(
        ‘Handled event "%s" on target "%s", with parameters %s‘,
        $event,
        $target,
        json_encode($params)
    );
}, $priority);

This would execute with high priority, meaning it would execute early. If we changed $priority to -100, it would execute with low priority, executing late.

While you can‘t necessarily know all the listeners attached, chances are you can make adequate guesses when necessary in order to set appropriate priority values.

We advise avoiding setting a priority value unless absolutely necessary.

Custom event objects

As noted earlier, an Event instance is created when you call either trigger() ortriggerUntil(), using the arguments passed to each; additionally, you can manually create an instance. Why would you do so, however?

One thing that looks like a code smell is when you have code like this:

$routeMatch = $e->getParam(‘route-match‘, false);
if (! $routeMatch) {
    // Oh noes! we cannot do our work! whatever shall we do?!?!?!
}

The problems with this are several:

  • Relying on string keys for event parameters is going to very quickly run into problems — typos when setting or retrieving the argument can lead to hard to debug situations.
  • Second, we now have a documentation issue; how do we document expected arguments? how do we document what we‘re shoving into the event?
  • Third, as a side effect, we can‘t use IDE or editor hinting support — string keys give these tools nothing to work with.

Similarly, consider how you might represent a computational result of a method when triggering an event. As an example:

// in the method:
$params[‘__RESULT__‘] = $computedResult;
$events->trigger(__FUNCTION__ . ‘.post‘, $this, $params);

// in the listener:
$result = $e->getParam(‘__RESULT__‘);
if (! $result) {
    // Oh noes! we cannot do our work! whatever shall we do?!?!?!
}

Sure, that key may be unique, but it suffers from a lot of the same issues.

The solution is to create custom event types. As an example, zend-mvc defines a custom MvcEvent; this event composes the application instance, the router, the route match, the request and response instances, the view model, and also a result. We end up with code like this in our listeners:

$response = $e->getResponse();
$result   = $e->getResult();
if (is_string($result)) {
    $content = $view->render(‘layout.phtml‘, [‘content‘ => $result]);
    $response->setContent($content);
}

As noted earlier, if using a custom event, you will need to use thetriggerEvent() and/or triggerEventUntil() methods instead of the normaltrigger() and triggerUntil().

Putting it together: Implementing a caching system

In previous sections, I indicated that short-circuiting is a way to potentially implement a caching solution. Let‘s create a full example.

First, let‘s define a method that could use caching. You‘ll note that in most of the examples, we use __FUNCTION__ as the event name; this is a good practice, as it makes code completion simpler, maps event names directly to the method triggering the event, and typically keeps the event names unique. However, in the case of a caching example, this might lead to identical events being triggered, as we will be triggering multiple events from the same method. In such cases, we recommend adding a semantic suffix: __FUNCTION__ . ‘pre‘,__FUNCTION__ . ‘post‘, __FUNCTION__ . ‘error‘, etc. We will use this convention in the upcoming example.

Additionally, you‘ll notice that the $params passed to the event are usually the parameters passed to the method. This is because those are often not stored in the object, and also to ensure the listeners have the exact same context as the calling method. In the upcoming example, however, we will be triggering an event using the results of execution, and will need a way of representing that. We have two possibilities:

  • Use a "magic" key, such as __RESULT__, and add that to our parameter list.
  • Create a custom event that allows injecting the result.

The latter is a more correct approach, as it introduces type safety, and prevents typographical errors. Let‘s create that event now:

use Zend\EventManager\Event;

class ExpensiveCallEvent extends Event
{
    private $criteria1;
    private $criteria2;
    private $result;

    public function __construct(以上是关于Using the EventManager的主要内容，如果未能解决你的问题，请参考以下文章
 

 Android studio提示Android Gradle plugin requires Java 11 to run. You are currently using Java 1.8.(代码片


 Android studio提示Android Gradle plugin requires Java 11 to run. You are currently using Java 1.8.(代码片


 The service already exists! The current server installed: D:mysqlmysql-5.7.30-winx64inmysqld My(代码片


 ASP.NET MVC 复制MVC项目代码到同一个项目的时候报错The request for ‘home’ has found the following matching controll(代码片


 Warning: Permanently added the RSA host key for IP address ‘13.250.177.223‘ to the list of known(代码片


 The CPU_ NUM is not specified, you should set CPU_ NUM in the environment variable list。 CPU NUM(代码片