java Atomic compareAndSet部分原理分析
Posted oceanking
tags:
篇首语:本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理,主要介绍了java Atomic compareAndSet部分原理分析相关的知识,希望对你有一定的参考价值。
以AtomicLong的compareAndSet方法举例。先说结论:如果CPU支持,则基于CPU指令(CMPXCHG8)实现;否则使用ObjectLocker锁实现。
分析过程如下:
该方法在jdk中源代码如下:
public final boolean compareAndSet(long expect, long update) { return unsafe.compareAndSwapLong(this, valueOffset, expect, update); }
unsafe是sun.misc.Unsafe的一个实例,Unsafe类在jdk中没有源代码,是由jvm提供的native代码。在openjdk中对应位置是hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/unsafe.cpp
jdk代码里没有用锁,对用户来说是无锁的操作
openjdk里是怎么实现unsafe.compareAndSwapLong的呢?直接用代码说话,如下:
UNSAFE_ENTRY(jboolean, Unsafe_CompareAndSwapLong(JNIEnv *env, jobject unsafe, jobject obj, jlong offset, jlong e, jlong x)) UnsafeWrapper("Unsafe_CompareAndSwapLong"); Handle p (THREAD, JNIHandles::resolve(obj)); jlong* addr = (jlong*)(index_oop_from_field_offset_long(p(), offset)); if (VM_Version::supports_cx8()) return (jlong)(Atomic::cmpxchg(x, addr, e)) == e; else { jboolean success = false; ObjectLocker ol(p, THREAD); if (*addr == e) { *addr = x; success = true; } return success; } UNSAFE_END
可以看到,如果不支持cx8,那么就需要用到ObjectLocker锁,那么什么 VM_Version::supports_cx8() 的底层实现又是什么呢?还是上代码,在openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/vm_version.hpp里
static bool supports_cx8() { #ifdef SUPPORTS_NATIVE_CX8 return true; #else return _supports_cx8; #endif }
_supports_cx8在何处赋值呢?该值默认为false,在x86系统中使用supports_cmpxchg8()方法赋值,在sparc系统中使用has_v9()赋值。我们来看一下x86系统中的情况,
static bool supports_cmpxchg8() { return (_cpuFeatures & CPU_CX8) != 0; }
_cpuFeatures定义如下:
static int _cpuFeatures; // features returned by the "cpuid" instruction // 0 if this instruction is not available
CPU_CX8定义如下:
enum { CPU_CX8 = (1 << 0), // next bits are from cpuid 1 (EDX) CPU_CMOV = (1 << 1), CPU_FXSR = (1 << 2), CPU_HT = (1 << 3), CPU_MMX = (1 << 4), CPU_3DNOW_PREFETCH = (1 << 5), // Processor supports 3dnow prefetch and prefetchw instructions // may not necessarily support other 3dnow instructions CPU_SSE = (1 << 6), CPU_SSE2 = (1 << 7), CPU_SSE3 = (1 << 8), // SSE3 comes from cpuid 1 (ECX) CPU_SSSE3 = (1 << 9), CPU_SSE4A = (1 << 10), CPU_SSE4_1 = (1 << 11), CPU_SSE4_2 = (1 << 12), CPU_POPCNT = (1 << 13), CPU_LZCNT = (1 << 14), CPU_TSC = (1 << 15), CPU_TSCINV = (1 << 16), CPU_AVX = (1 << 17), CPU_AVX2 = (1 << 18), CPU_AES = (1 << 19), CPU_ERMS = (1 << 20), // enhanced ‘rep movsb/stosb‘ instructions CPU_CLMUL = (1 << 21) // carryless multiply for CRC } cpuFeatureFlags;
在刨根问底_cpuFeatures的值是怎么来的?
_cpuFeatures = feature_flags();
static uint32_t feature_flags() { uint32_t result = 0; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_edx.bits.cmpxchg8 != 0) result |= CPU_CX8; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_edx.bits.cmov != 0) result |= CPU_CMOV; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_edx.bits.fxsr != 0 || (is_amd() && _cpuid_info.ext_cpuid1_edx.bits.fxsr != 0)) result |= CPU_FXSR; // HT flag is set for multi-core processors also. if (threads_per_core() > 1) result |= CPU_HT; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_edx.bits.mmx != 0 || (is_amd() && _cpuid_info.ext_cpuid1_edx.bits.mmx != 0)) result |= CPU_MMX; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_edx.bits.sse != 0) result |= CPU_SSE; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_edx.bits.sse2 != 0) result |= CPU_SSE2; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.sse3 != 0) result |= CPU_SSE3; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.ssse3 != 0) result |= CPU_SSSE3; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.sse4_1 != 0) result |= CPU_SSE4_1; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.sse4_2 != 0) result |= CPU_SSE4_2; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.popcnt != 0) result |= CPU_POPCNT; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.avx != 0 && _cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.osxsave != 0 && _cpuid_info.xem_xcr0_eax.bits.sse != 0 && _cpuid_info.xem_xcr0_eax.bits.ymm != 0) { result |= CPU_AVX; if (_cpuid_info.sef_cpuid7_ebx.bits.avx2 != 0) result |= CPU_AVX2; } if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_edx.bits.tsc != 0) result |= CPU_TSC; if (_cpuid_info.ext_cpuid7_edx.bits.tsc_invariance != 0) result |= CPU_TSCINV; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.aes != 0) result |= CPU_AES; if (_cpuid_info.sef_cpuid7_ebx.bits.erms != 0) result |= CPU_ERMS; if (_cpuid_info.std_cpuid1_ecx.bits.clmul != 0) result |= CPU_CLMUL; // AMD features. if (is_amd()) { if ((_cpuid_info.ext_cpuid1_edx.bits.tdnow != 0) || (_cpuid_info.ext_cpuid1_ecx.bits.prefetchw != 0)) result |= CPU_3DNOW_PREFETCH; if (_cpuid_info.ext_cpuid1_ecx.bits.lzcnt != 0) result |= CPU_LZCNT; if (_cpuid_info.ext_cpuid1_ecx.bits.sse4a != 0) result |= CPU_SSE4A; } return result; }
至此,基本可以断定这里的判断,是从CPUID中获取的信息,来看CPU是否支持CMPXCHG8指令。
再回过头来看这句:
return (jlong)(Atomic::cmpxchg(x, addr, e)) == e;
这里Atomic::cmpxchg方法是核心,定义在openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/atomic.hpp
inline static jlong cmpxchg (jlong exchange_value, volatile jlong* dest, jlong compare_value);
在不同系统中有不同的实现,在linux_x86中:openjdk/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_x86/vm/atomic_linux_x86.inline.hpp
inline jlong Atomic::cmpxchg (jlong exchange_value, volatile jlong* dest, jlong compare_value) { bool mp = os::is_MP(); __asm__ __volatile__ (LOCK_IF_MP(%4) "cmpxchgq %1,(%3)" : "=a" (exchange_value) : "r" (exchange_value), "a" (compare_value), "r" (dest), "r" (mp) : "cc", "memory"); return exchange_value; }
在windows_x86中:openjdk/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_x86/vm/atomic_windows_x86.inline.hpp
inline jlong Atomic::cmpxchg (jlong exchange_value, volatile jlong* dest, jlong compare_value) { int mp = os::is_MP(); jint ex_lo = (jint)exchange_value; jint ex_hi = *( ((jint*)&exchange_value) + 1 ); jint cmp_lo = (jint)compare_value; jint cmp_hi = *( ((jint*)&compare_value) + 1 ); __asm { push ebx push edi mov eax, cmp_lo mov edx, cmp_hi mov edi, dest mov ebx, ex_lo mov ecx, ex_hi LOCK_IF_MP(mp) cmpxchg8b qword ptr [edi] pop edi pop ebx } }
可以看出,当CPU支持时,最终确实是直接用cmpxchg相关指令实现的。
以上是关于java Atomic compareAndSet部分原理分析的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章
廖雪峰Java11多线程编程-3高级concurrent包-5Atomic