String拼接字符串效率低,你知道原因吗?
Posted 山河永慕
tags:
篇首语:本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理,主要介绍了String拼接字符串效率低,你知道原因吗?相关的知识,希望对你有一定的参考价值。
面试官Q1:请问为什么String用"+"拼接字符串效率低下,最好能从JVM角度谈谈吗?
对于这个问题,我们先来看看如下代码:
public class StringTest { public static void main(String[] args) { String a = "abc"; String b = "def"; String c = a + b; String d = "abc" + "def"; System.out.Println(c); System.out.Println(d); } }
打印结果:
abcdef
abcdef
从上面代码示例中,我们看到两种方式拼接的字符串打印的结果是一样的。但这只是表面上的,实际内部运行不一样。
两者究竟有什么不一样?
为了看到两者的不同,对代码做如下调整:
public class StringTest { public static void main(String[] args) { String a = "abc"; String b = "def"; String c = a + b; System.out.Println(c); } }
我们看看编译完成后它是什么样子:
C:\Users\GRACE\Documents>javac StringTest.java 2C:\Users\GRACE\Documents>javap -verbose StringTest 3Classfile /C:/Users/GRACE/Documents/StringTest.class 4 Last modified 2018-7-21; size 607 bytes 5 MD5 checksum a2729f11e22d7e1153a209e5ac968b98 6 Compiled from "StringTest.java" 7public class StringTest 8 minor version: 0 9 major version: 52 10 flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_SUPER 11Constant pool: 12 #1 = Methodref #11.#20 // java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 13 #2 = String #21 // abc 14 #3 = String #22 // def 15 #4 = Class #23 // java/lang/StringBuilder 16 #5 = Methodref #4.#20 // java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":()V 17 #6 = Methodref #4.#24 // java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 18 #7 = Methodref #4.#25 // java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String; 19 #8 = Fieldref #26.#27 // java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 20 #9 = Methodref #28.#29 // java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 21 #10 = Class #30 // StringTest 22 #11 = Class #31 // java/lang/Object 23 #12 = Utf8 <init> 24 #13 = Utf8 ()V 25 #14 = Utf8 Code 26 #15 = Utf8 LineNumberTable 27 #16 = Utf8 main 28 #17 = Utf8 ([Ljava/lang/String;)V 29 #18 = Utf8 SourceFile 30 #19 = Utf8 StringTest.java 31 #20 = NameAndType #12:#13 // "<init>":()V 32 #21 = Utf8 abc 33 #22 = Utf8 def 34 #23 = Utf8 java/lang/StringBuilder 35 #24 = NameAndType #32:#33 // append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 36 #25 = NameAndType #34:#35 // toString:()Ljava/lang/String; 37 #26 = Class #36 // java/lang/System 38 #27 = NameAndType #37:#38 // out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 39 #28 = Class #39 // java/io/PrintStream 40 #29 = NameAndType #40:#41 // println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 41 #30 = Utf8 StringTest 42 #31 = Utf8 java/lang/Object 43 #32 = Utf8 append 44 #33 = Utf8 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 45 #34 = Utf8 toString 46 #35 = Utf8 ()Ljava/lang/String; 47 #36 = Utf8 java/lang/System 48 #37 = Utf8 out 49 #38 = Utf8 Ljava/io/PrintStream; 50 #39 = Utf8 java/io/PrintStream 51 #40 = Utf8 println 52 #41 = Utf8 (Ljava/lang/String;)V 53{ 54 public StringTest(); 55 descriptor: ()V 56 flags: ACC_PUBLIC 57 Code: 58 stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1 59 0: aload_0 60 1: invokespecial #1 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 61 4: return 62 LineNumberTable: 63 line 1: 0 64 65 public static void main(java.lang.String[]); 66 descriptor: ([Ljava/lang/String;)V 67 flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_STATIC 68 Code: 69 stack=2, locals=4, args_size=1 70 0: ldc #2 // String abc 71 2: astore_1 72 3: ldc #3 // String def 73 5: astore_2 74 6: new #4 // class java/lang/StringBuilder 75 9: dup 76 10: invokespecial #5 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":()V 77 13: aload_1 78 14: invokevirtual #6 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 79 17: aload_2 80 18: invokevirtual #6 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 81 21: invokevirtual #7 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String; 82 24: astore_3 83 25: getstatic #8 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 84 28: aload_3 85 29: invokevirtual #9 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 86 32: return 87 LineNumberTable: 88 line 3: 0 89 line 4: 3 90 line 5: 6 91 line 6: 25 92 line 7: 32 93} 94SourceFile: "StringTest.java"
首先看到使用了一个指针指向一个常量池中的对象内容为“abc”,而另一个指针指向“def”,此时通过new申请了一个StringBuilder,然后调用这个StringBuilder的初始化方法;然后分别做了两次append操作,然后最后做一个toString()操作;可见String的+在编译后会被编译为StringBuilder来运行,我们知道这里做了一个new StringBuilder的操作,并且做了一个toString的操作,如果你对JVM有所了解,凡是new出来的对象绝对不会放在常量池中,toString会发生一次内容拷贝,但是也不会在常量池中,所以在这里常量池String+常量池String放在了堆中。
我们再来看看另外一种情况,用同样的方式来看看结果是什么:
代码如下:
public class StringTest { public static void main(String[] args) { String c = "abc" + "def"; System.out.println(c); } }
我们也来看看它编译完成后是什么样子:
C:\Users\GRACE\Documents>javac StringTest.java 2 3C:\Users\GRACE\Documents>javap -verbose StringTest 4Classfile /C:/Users/GRACE/Documents/StringTest.class 5 Last modified 2018-7-21; size 426 bytes 6 MD5 checksum c659d48ff8aeb45a3338dea5d129f593 7 Compiled from "StringTest.java" 8public class StringTest 9 minor version: 0 10 major version: 52 11 flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_SUPER 12Constant pool: 13 #1 = Methodref #6.#15 // java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 14 #2 = String #16 // abcdef 15 #3 = Fieldref #17.#18 // java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 16 #4 = Methodref #19.#20 // java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 17 #5 = Class #21 // StringTest 18 #6 = Class #22 // java/lang/Object 19 #7 = Utf8 <init> 20 #8 = Utf8 ()V 21 #9 = Utf8 Code 22 #10 = Utf8 LineNumberTable 23 #11 = Utf8 main 24 #12 = Utf8 ([Ljava/lang/String;)V 25 #13 = Utf8 SourceFile 26 #14 = Utf8 StringTest.java 27 #15 = NameAndType #7:#8 // "<init>":()V 28 #16 = Utf8 abcdef 29 #17 = Class #23 // java/lang/System 30 #18 = NameAndType #24:#25 // out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 31 #19 = Class #26 // java/io/PrintStream 32 #20 = NameAndType #27:#28 // println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 33 #21 = Utf8 StringTest 34 #22 = Utf8 java/lang/Object 35 #23 = Utf8 java/lang/System 36 #24 = Utf8 out 37 #25 = Utf8 Ljava/io/PrintStream; 38 #26 = Utf8 java/io/PrintStream 39 #27 = Utf8 println 40 #28 = Utf8 (Ljava/lang/String;)V 41{ 42 public StringTest(); 43 descriptor: ()V 44 flags: ACC_PUBLIC 45 Code: 46 stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1 47 0: aload_0 48 1: invokespecial #1 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 49 4: return 50 LineNumberTable: 51 line 1: 0 52 53 public static void main(java.lang.String[]); 54 descriptor: ([Ljava/lang/String;)V 55 flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_STATIC 56 Code: 57 stack=2, locals=2, args_size=1 58 0: ldc #2 // String abcdef 59 2: astore_1 60 3: getstatic #3 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 61 6: aload_1 62 7: invokevirtual #4 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 63 10: return 64 LineNumberTable: 65 line 3: 0 66 line 4: 3 67 line 5: 10 68} 69SourceFile: "StringTest.java"
这一次编译完后的代码比前面少了很多,而且,仔细看,你会发现14行处,编译的过程中直接变成了"abcdef",这是为什么呢?因为当发生“abc” + “def”在同一行发生时,JVM在编译时就认为这个加号是没有用处的,编译的时候就直接变成
String d = "abcdef";
同理如果出现:String a =“a” + 1,编译时候就会变成:String a = “a1″;
再补充一个例子:
final String a = "a"; final String b = "ab"; String c = a + b;
在编译时候,c部分会被编译为:String c = “aab”;但是如果a或b有任意一个不是final的,都会new一个新的对象出来;其次再补充下,如果a和b,是某个方法返回回来的,不论方法中是final类型的还是常量什么的,都不会被在编译时将数据编译到常量池,因为编译器并不会跟踪到方法体里面去看你做了什么,其次只要是变量就是可变的,即使你认为你看到的代码是不可变的,但是运行时是可以被切入的。
那么效率问题从何说起?
那说了这么多,也没看到有说效率方面的问题呀?
其实上面两个例子,连接字符串行表达式很简单,那么"+"和StringBuilder基本是一样的,但如果结构比较复杂,如使用循环来连接字符串,那么产生的Java Byte Code就会有很大的区别。我们再来看看下面一段代码:
import java.util.*; public class StringTest { public static void main(String[] args){ String s = ""; Random rand = new Random(); for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++){ s = s + rand.nextInt(1000) + " "; } System.out.println(s); } }
上面代码反编译后的结果如下:
C:\Java\jdk1.8.0_171\bin>javap -c E:\StringTest.class Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Xmx512M Compiled from "StringTest.java" public class StringTest { public StringTest(); Code: 0: aload_0 1: invokespecial #8 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 4: return public static void main(java.lang.String[]); Code: //String s = ""; 0: ldc #16 // String 2: astore_1 //Random rand = new Random(); 3: new #18 // class java/util/Random 6: dup 7: invokespecial #20 // Method java/util/Random."<init>":()V 10: astore_2 //StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder(); 11: iconst_0 12: istore_3 13: goto 49 //s = (new StringBuilder(String.valueOf(s))).append(rand.nextInt(1000)).append(" ").toString(); 16: new #21 // class java/lang/StringBuilder 19: dup 20: aload_1 21: invokestatic #23 // Method java/lang/String.valueOf:(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/String; 24: invokespecial #29 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":(Ljava/lang/String;)V 27: aload_2 28: sipush 1000 31: invokevirtual #32 // Method java/util/Random.nextInt:(I)I 34: invokevirtual #36 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(I)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 37: ldc #40 // String 39: invokevirtual #42 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 42: invokevirtual #45 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String; 45: astore_1 46: iinc 3, 1 49: iload_3 50: bipush 10 52: if_icmplt 16 //System.out.println(s); 55: getstatic #49 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 58: aload_1 59: invokevirtual #55 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 62: return }
我们可以看到,虽然编译器将"+"转换成了StringBuilder,但创建StringBuilder对象的位置却在for语句内部。这就意味着每执行一次循环,就会创建一个StringBuilder对象(对于本例来说,是创建了10个StringBuilder对象),虽然Java有垃圾回收器,但这个回收器的工作时间是不定的。如果不断产生这样的垃圾,那么仍然会占用大量的资源。解决这个问题的方法就是在程序中直接使用StringBuilder来连接字符串,代码如下:
import java.util.Random; public class StringTest { public static void main(String[] args) { Random rand = new Random(); StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder(); for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { result.append(rand.nextInt(1000)); result.append(" "); } System.out.println(result.toString()); } }
上面代码反编译后的结果如下:
C:\Java\jdk1.8.0_171\bin>javap -c E:\Dubbo\Demo\bin\StringTest.class Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Xmx512M Compiled from "StringTest.java" public class StringTest { public StringTest(); Code: 0: aload_0 1: invokespecial #8 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 4: return public static void main(java.lang.String[]); Code: //Random rand = new Random(); 0: new #16 // class java/util/Random 3: dup 4: invokespecial #18 // Method java/util/Random."<init>":()V 7: astore_1 //StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder(); 8: new #19 // class java/lang/StringBuilder 11: dup 12: invokespecial #21 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":()V 15: astore_2 //for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) 16: iconst_0 17: istore_3 18: goto 43 //result.append(rand.nextInt(1000)); 21: aload_2 22: aload_1 23: sipush 1000 26: invokevirtual #22 // Method java/util/Random.nextInt:(I)I 29: invokevirtual #26 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(I)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 32: pop //result.append(" "); 33: aload_2 34: ldc #30 // String 36: invokevirtual #32 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder; 39: pop 40: iinc 3, 1 43: iload_3 44: bipush 10 46: if_icmplt 21 //System.out.println(result.toString()); 49: getstatic #35 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 52: aload_2 53: invokevirtual #41 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String; 56: invokevirtual #45 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V 59: return }
从上面的反编译结果可以看出,创建StringBuilder的代码被放在了for语句外。虽然这样处理在源程序中看起来复杂,但却换来了更高的效率,同时消耗的资源也更少了。
所以,从上述几个例子中我们得出的结论是:String采用连接运算符(+)效率低下,都是上述循环、大批量数据情况造成的,每做一次"+"就产生个StringBuilder对象,然后append后就扔掉。下次循环再到达时重新产生个StringBuilder对象,然后append字符串,如此循环直至结束。如果我们直接采用StringBuilder对象进行append的话,我们可以节省创建和销毁对象的时间。如果只是简单的字面量拼接或者很少的字符串拼接,性能都是差不多的。
C:\Users\GRACE\Documents>javac StringTest.java
2C:\Users\GRACE\Documents>javap -verbose StringTest
3Classfile /C:/Users/GRACE/Documents/StringTest.class
4 Last modified 2018-7-21; size 607 bytes
5 MD5 checksum a2729f11e22d7e1153a209e5ac968b98
6 Compiled from "StringTest.java"
7public class StringTest
8 minor version: 0
9 major version: 52
10 flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_SUPER
11Constant pool:
12 #1 = Methodref #11.#20 // java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
13 #2 = String #21 // abc
14 #3 = String #22 // def
15 #4 = Class #23 // java/lang/StringBuilder
16 #5 = Methodref #4.#20 // java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":()V
17 #6 = Methodref #4.#24 // java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
18 #7 = Methodref #4.#25 // java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String;
19 #8 = Fieldref #26.#27 // java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
20 #9 = Methodref #28.#29 // java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
21 #10 = Class #30 // StringTest
22 #11 = Class #31 // java/lang/Object
23 #12 = Utf8 <init>
24 #13 = Utf8 ()V
25 #14 = Utf8 Code
26 #15 = Utf8 LineNumberTable
27 #16 = Utf8 main
28 #17 = Utf8 ([Ljava/lang/String;)V
29 #18 = Utf8 SourceFile
30 #19 = Utf8 StringTest.java
31 #20 = NameAndType #12:#13 // "<init>":()V
32 #21 = Utf8 abc
33 #22 = Utf8 def
34 #23 = Utf8 java/lang/StringBuilder
35 #24 = NameAndType #32:#33 // append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
36 #25 = NameAndType #34:#35 // toString:()Ljava/lang/String;
37 #26 = Class #36 // java/lang/System
38 #27 = NameAndType #37:#38 // out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
39 #28 = Class #39 // java/io/PrintStream
40 #29 = NameAndType #40:#41 // println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
41 #30 = Utf8 StringTest
42 #31 = Utf8 java/lang/Object
43 #32 = Utf8 append
44 #33 = Utf8 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
45 #34 = Utf8 toString
46 #35 = Utf8 ()Ljava/lang/String;
47 #36 = Utf8 java/lang/System
48 #37 = Utf8 out
49 #38 = Utf8 Ljava/io/PrintStream;
50 #39 = Utf8 java/io/PrintStream
51 #40 = Utf8 println
52 #41 = Utf8 (Ljava/lang/String;)V
53{
54 public StringTest();
55 descriptor: ()V
56 flags: ACC_PUBLIC
57 Code:
58 stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1
59 0: aload_0
60 1: invokespecial #1 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
61 4: return
62 LineNumberTable:
63 line 1: 0
64
65 public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
66 descriptor: ([Ljava/lang/String;)V
67 flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_STATIC
68 Code:
69 stack=2, locals=4, args_size=1
70 0: ldc #2 // String abc
71 2: astore_1
72 3: ldc #3 // String def
73 5: astore_2
74 6: new #4 // class java/lang/StringBuilder
75 9: dup
76 10: invokespecial #5 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":()V
77 13: aload_1
78 14: invokevirtual #6 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
79 17: aload_2
80 18: invokevirtual #6 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
81 21: invokevirtual #7 // Method java/lang/StringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String;
82 24: astore_3
83 25: getstatic #8 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
84 28: aload_3
85 29: invokevirtual #9 // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(Ljava/lang/String;)V
86 32: return
87 LineNumberTable:
88 line 3: 0
89 line 4: 3
90 line 5: 6
91 line 6: 25
92 line 7: 32
93}
94SourceFile: "StringTest.java"
以上是关于String拼接字符串效率低,你知道原因吗?的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章
对字符串进行频繁拼接的话,使用StringBuffer或者StringBuilder