性能优化 ---- 避免使用 BeanUtils copy
Posted wenniuwuren
tags:
篇首语:本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理,主要介绍了性能优化 ---- 避免使用 BeanUtils copy相关的知识,希望对你有一定的参考价值。
一、背景
在开发过程中,我们经常会遇到对象的转换,比如外部的 DTO 对象转换为内部的 DO 对象,这里面很多字段名都是相等的,要是一个一个去 get/set 很多人会觉得很烦,于是为了方便和代码的简介大家不约而同地找到了 UtilsBean.copy 相关的对象属性copy工具包。
当我们系统还只是 QPS 几十上百时,可能我们对系统的性能优化还不用到这么细致,当我们的系统 QPS/TPS 达到几十万上百万的时候,UtilsBean.copy 的开销问题就会凸显。
二、Apache、Spring、CGLib、Getter/Setter 属性copy 性能对比
package test.bean.copy;
import net.sf.cglib.beans.BeanCopier;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class BeanCopyTest
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
TargetDTO targetDTO = new TargetDTO();
SourceDTO sourceDTO = new SourceDTO();
sourceDTO.setAge(18);
sourceDTO.setName("wenniuwuren");
int totalTimes = 10000;
/**
* Apache BeanUtils
*/
long startTime1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtils.copyProperties(targetDTO, sourceDTO);
System.out.println("Apache BeanUtils single thread cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime1) + targetDTO.getName() + targetDTO.getAge());
ExecutorService executorService4 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3);
long startTime4 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
executorService4.submit(new Runnable()
@Override
public void run()
try
org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtils.copyProperties(new TargetDTO(), sourceDTO);
catch (Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
);
executorService4.shutdown();
while (true)
if (executorService4.isTerminated())
System.out.println("Apache BeanUtils muti thread cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime4));
break;
/**
* Spring BeanUtils
*/
targetDTO = new TargetDTO();
long startTime2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.copyProperties(sourceDTO, targetDTO);
System.out.println("Spring BeanUtils single thread cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime2) + targetDTO.getName() + targetDTO.getAge());
ExecutorService executorService5 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3);
long startTime5 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
executorService5.submit(new Runnable()
@Override
public void run()
try
org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.copyProperties(sourceDTO, new TargetDTO());
catch (Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
);
executorService5.shutdown();
while (true)
if (executorService5.isTerminated())
System.out.println("Spring BeanUtils muti thread cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime5));
break;
/**
* CGLib BeanUtils
*/
targetDTO = new TargetDTO();
long startTime3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
BeanCopier beanCopier = BeanCopier.create(SourceDTO.class, TargetDTO.class, false);
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
beanCopier.copy(sourceDTO, targetDTO, null);
System.out.println("CGLib BeanUtils cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime3) + targetDTO.getName() + targetDTO.getAge());
ExecutorService executorService6 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3);
long startTime6 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
executorService6.submit(new Runnable()
@Override
public void run()
try
beanCopier.copy(sourceDTO, new TargetDTO(), null);
catch (Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
);
executorService6.shutdown();
while (true)
if (executorService6.isTerminated())
System.out.println("CGLib BeanUtils muti thread cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime6));
break;
/**
* Getter Setter
*/
long startTime7 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
targetDTO.setAge(sourceDTO.getAge());
targetDTO.setName(sourceDTO.getName());
System.out.println("GetterSetter single thread cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime7) + targetDTO.getName() + targetDTO.getAge());
ExecutorService executorService8 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3);
long startTime8 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < totalTimes; i++)
executorService8.submit(new Runnable()
@Override
public void run()
try
final TargetDTO targetDTO = new TargetDTO();
targetDTO.setAge(sourceDTO.getAge());
targetDTO.setName(sourceDTO.getName());
catch (Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
);
executorService8.shutdown();
while (true)
if (executorService8.isTerminated())
System.out.println("GetterSetter muti thread cost:" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime8));
break;
运行结果:
Apache BeanUtils single thread cost:216nullnull
Apache BeanUtils muti thread cost:62
Spring BeanUtils single thread cost:168wenniuwuren18
Spring BeanUtils muti thread cost:18
CGLib BeanUtils cost:72wenniuwuren18
CGLib BeanUtils muti thread cost:8
GetterSetter single thread cost:0wenniuwuren18
GetterSetter muti thread cost:12
三、结论
从上述结果可以看出来,性能上 Getter/Setter > CGLib > Spring > Apache
优点
1、简洁方便,耗时短
缺点
1、性能较差,因为 BeanUtils.copy 实现是通过java反射机制
2、引用查找难,BeanUtils.copy的实现会隐藏对象属性的设置的调用,想查看target属性A有哪些地方被设值了,那么通过IDE查找引用会漏掉BeanUtils.copy的设置
以上是关于性能优化 ---- 避免使用 BeanUtils copy的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章
为啥阿里代码规约要求避免使用 Apache BeanUtils 进行属性复制