有效地与请求异步下载文件

Posted

tags:

篇首语:本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理,主要介绍了有效地与请求异步下载文件相关的知识,希望对你有一定的参考价值。

我想用python尽可能快地下载文件。这是我的代码

import pandas as pd
import requests
from requests_futures.sessions import FuturesSession
import os
import pathlib
from timeit import default_timer as timer


class AsyncDownloader:
    """Download files asynchronously"""

    __urls = set()
    __dest_path = None
    __user_agent = 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0'
    __read_timeout = 60
    __connection_timeout = 30
    __download_count = 0  # unlimited
    # http://www.browserscope.org/?category=network
    __worker_count = 17  # No of threads to spawn
    __chunk_size = 1024
    __download_time = -1
    __errors = []

    # TODO Fetch only content of a specific type from a csv
    # TODO Improve code structure so that it can be used as a commandline tool

    def set_source_csv(self, source_path, column_name):
        self.source_path = source_path
        self.column_name = column_name

        try:
            my_csv = pd.read_csv(source_path, usecols=[self.column_name], chunksize=10)
        except ValueError:
            print("The column name doesn't exist")
            return
        else:
            # No exception whatsoever
            for chunk in my_csv:
                AsyncDownloader.__urls.update(set(getattr(chunk, self.column_name)))

    def set_destination_path(self, dest_path):
        if dest_path.endswith('/'):
            dest_path = dest_path[:-1]
        self.dest_path = dest_path
        # TODO Add exception in case we can't create the directory
        pathlib.Path(self.dest_path).mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
        if os.access(self.dest_path, os.W_OK):
            AsyncDownloader.__dest_path = pathlib.Path(self.dest_path).resolve()

    def set_user_agent(self, useragent):
        self.useragent = useragent
        AsyncDownloader.__user_agent = self.useragent

    def set_connection_timeout(self, ctimeout_secs):
        self.timeout_secs = ctimeout_secs
        if self.timeout_secs >= 0:
            AsyncDownloader.__connection_timeout = self.timeout_secs

    def set_read_timeout(self, rtimeout_secs):
        self.timeout_secs = rtimeout_secs
        if self.timeout_secs >= 0:
            AsyncDownloader.__read_timeout = self.timeout_secs

    def set_download_count(self, file_count):
        self.file_count = file_count
        if self.file_count > 0:
            AsyncDownloader.__download_count = self.file_count

    def set_worker_count(self, worker_count):
        self.worker_count = worker_count
        if self.worker_count > 0:
            AsyncDownloader.__worker_count = self.worker_count

    def set_chunk_size(self, chunk_size):
        self.chunk_size = chunk_size
        if self.chunk_size > 0:
            AsyncDownloader.__chunk_size = self.chunk_size

    def print_urls(self):
        print(AsyncDownloader.__urls)

    def get_download_time(self):
        return AsyncDownloader.__download_time

    def get_errors(self):
        return AsyncDownloader.__errors

    def download(self):
        start = timer()
        try:
            session = FuturesSession(max_workers=AsyncDownloader.__worker_count)
            session.headers.update({'user-agent': AsyncDownloader.__user_agent})
            session.request(AsyncDownloader.__connection_timeout,
                            AsyncDownloader.__connection_timeout, stream=True)

            results = []
            # Give an accurate file count even if we don't have to download it as it a;ready exist
            file_count = 0

            for url in AsyncDownloader.__urls:
                filename = os.path.basename(url)
                # check if we need only a limited number of files
                if AsyncDownloader.__download_count != 0:
                    # No need to download file if it already exist
                    if pathlib.Path(AsyncDownloader.__dest_path / filename).is_file():
                        file_count += 1
                        continue
                    else:
                        if file_count < AsyncDownloader.__download_count:
                            file_count += 1
                            results.append(session.get(url))
                else:
                    if not pathlib.Path(AsyncDownloader.__dest_path / filename).is_file():
                        results.append(session.get(url))

            for result in results:
                # wait for the response to complete, if it hasn't already
                response = result.result()
                filename = os.path.basename(response.url)
                if response.status_code == 200:
                    with open(pathlib.Path(AsyncDownloader.__dest_path / filename).resolve(), 'wb') as fd:
                        for chunk in response.iter_content(chunk_size=AsyncDownloader.__chunk_size):
                            if chunk:  # filter out keep-alive new chunks
                                fd.write(chunk)

            end = timer()
            AsyncDownloader.__download_time = end - start

        except requests.exceptions.HTTPError as errh:
            AsyncDownloader.__errors.append("Http Error:" + errh)
            # print("Http Error:", errh)
        except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError as errc:
            AsyncDownloader.__errors.append("Error Connecting:" + errc)
            # print("Error Connecting:", errc)
        except requests.exceptions.Timeout as errt:
            AsyncDownloader.__errors.append("Timeout Error:" + errt)
            # print("Timeout Error:", errt)
        except requests.exceptions.RequestException as err:
            AsyncDownloader.__errors.append("OOps: Something Else" + err)
        else:
            return

下面的代码做了一个非常糟糕的假设。事实上,我假设第一个网址将首先完成,当然这是不正确的。

# wait for the response to complete, if it hasn't already
response = result.result()

如何确保只处理已完成的请求,而不是以有效的方式采取上述假设?

我将不胜感激任何有关如何提高性能的建议。

亲切的问候

答案

即使连接按顺序完成,您仍然按顺序处理文件。第二个文件必须等待第一个文件写入,依此类推。因此,你可以做的最好的事情是并行处理所有内容(尽管有GIL,这可以完成,因为像写入磁盘和从网络读取等操作会释放它)。基本上,使用常规requests库(而不是requests-futures)并为每个请求创建未来/线程+文件处理。

还有更多的方法可以让它更快,比如在写入时继续下载块(即两个线程,一个用于请求,一个用于文件处理)。通过制作multi-part请求并行读取块,这是“下载加速器”的领域,您可能不希望代码中出现这种复杂性。

编辑:此外,分块下载是懒惰的,这意味着您只是并行地进行初始请求,但实际的分块文件下载是按顺序进行的,因为它是在主线程中完成的。因此,您当前的方法并不比完全同步的方法好多少。上述建议仍然有效。

另一答案

为了处理你的代码,我创建了一个.csv文件,其中包含几个网站中几个robots.txt文件的链接:GitHub,UDemy,YouTube。

调试后,第一个结果

response = result.result()

是(按此顺序):UDemy,YouTube,GitHub。为了记录,每个robots.txt的大小增加的顺序与我得到的结果相同。这意味着开始没有问题,尽管我按特定顺序设置了.csv文件,结果按照文件首次下载的顺序排列。

我将不胜感激任何有关如何提高性能的建议。

至于性能,您可以通过创建用于将响应写入文件的线程或使用异步IO库(例如Tinche/aiofiles)来提高速度。

如果你想更进一步,可以尝试通过使用Python的替代实现来改进程序本身的性能,例如PyPy

另一答案

最简单的方法是不需要任何线程或特殊的异步代码:只需使用常规的requests库及其内置的流媒体选项。你说response = session.get(url, stream=True)然后使用response.iter_content(chunk_size=1024)(例如)一次访问一个块的下载信息。这是一个功能性的例子:

import requests
import os

def stream_multiple(urls):
    responses = {url: requests.get(url, stream=True) for url in urls)
    streams = {url: responses[url].iter_content(chunk_size=1024)
            for url in urls}
    handles = {url: open(os.path.basename(url), 'wb') for url in urls}
    while streams:
        for url in list(streams.keys()):
            try:
                chunk = next(streams[url])
                print("Received {} bytes for {}".format(len(chunk), url))
                handles[url].write(chunk)
            except StopIteration: # no more contenet
                handles[url].close()
                streams.pop(url)

样本输出:

rat@pandion:~/tmp$ python smu.py
Received 1296 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/files/9490/9490-0.txt
Received 1882 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/21497.txt.utf-8
Received 1524 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1729/1729-0.txt
Received 1508 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/21790.txt.utf-8
Received 1826 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/files/9490/9490-0.txt
Received 2349 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/21497.txt.utf-8
Received 1834 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1729/1729-0.txt
Received 1838 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/21790.txt.utf-8
Received 2009 bytes for http://www.gutenberg.org/files/9490/9490-0.txt
...

使用线程或多处理可能会略微提高性能,但我怀疑这会更好。几乎在所有情况下,将数据写入磁盘的速度远远快于从网络接收数据。

另一答案

如果你不担心“猴子补丁”你可以使用gevent

import gevent.monkey
import requests

CONNECTIONS = 10

gevent.monkey.patch_all()  # debug in PyCharm: https://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2012/08/gevent-debug-support/

import gevent.pool


def your_request_without_any_changes(url):
    return requests.get(url)


pool = gevent.pool.Pool(CONNECTIONS)
for response in pool.imap_unordered(your_request_without_any_changes, ['http://www.google.com'] * 100):
    print(response.status_code)

当我们等待响应时,gevent使用“事件循环”和补丁请求库(实际上它发生在较低级别)来切换到另一个任务。

以上是关于有效地与请求异步下载文件的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章

Python 向 Postman 请求代码片段

前端面试题之手写promise

js异步下载文件请求

Ajax异步请求返回文件流(eg:导出文件时,直接将导出数据用文件流的形式返回客户端供客户下载)

使用 HttpClient 进行异步文件下载

在哪里以及如何使用片段填充我的标签