C++ 实现线程安全的map(OpenHarmony源码实现版)

Posted 特立独行的猫a

tags:

篇首语:本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理,主要介绍了C++ 实现线程安全的map(OpenHarmony源码实现版)相关的知识,希望对你有一定的参考价值。

概述

STL容器不是线程安全的。比如对于vector,即使写方(生产者)是单线程写入,但是并发读的时候,由于潜在的内存重新申请和对象复制问题,会导致读方(消费者)的迭代器失效。实际表现也就是招致了core dump。另外一种情况,如果是多个写方,并发的push_back(),也会导致core dump。但可以通过固定vector的大小(调用resize())避免动态扩容(无push_back)来做到lock-free。

c++的map的并发操作也是不安全的,c++里边有红黑树实现的std::map和hash表 unordered_map。在《C++并发编程实战》一书中的162页提供了一个细粒度锁的MAP数据结构,使用了 boost的shared_mutex (C++14已经支持,C++11没有),那上面的实现代码挺长的,这里给出个鸿蒙源码实现的safe_map,代码精简,值得学习。

接上篇欣赏了OpenHarmony源码中实现的ThreadPool的实现,链接在这里:

c++的ThreadPool,OpenHarmony源码实现版赏析和使用

源码实现

源码位置:code-v3.0-LTS\\OpenHarmony\\utils\\native\\base\\include\\safe_map.h

/*
 * Copyright (c) 2021 Huawei Device Co., Ltd.
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

#ifndef UTILS_BASE_SAFE_MAP_H
#define UTILS_BASE_SAFE_MAP_H

#include <map>
#include <mutex>

namespace OHOS 

template <typename K, typename V>
class SafeMap 
public:
    SafeMap() 

    ~SafeMap() 

    SafeMap(const SafeMap& rhs)
    
        map_ = rhs.map_;
    

    SafeMap& operator=(const SafeMap& rhs)
    
        if (&rhs != this) 
            map_ = rhs.map_;
        

        return *this;
    

    V& operator[](const K& key)
    
        return map_[key];
    

    // when multithread calling size() return a tmp status, some threads may insert just after size() call
    int Size()
    
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);
        return map_.size();
    

    // when multithread calling Empty() return a tmp status, some threads may insert just after Empty() call
    bool IsEmpty()
    
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);
        return map_.empty();
    

    bool Insert(const K& key, const V& value)
    
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);
        auto ret = map_.insert(std::pair<K, V>(key, value));
        return ret.second;
    

    void EnsureInsert(const K& key, const V& value)
    
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);
        auto ret = map_.insert(std::pair<K, V>(key, value));
        // find key and cannot insert
        if (!ret.second) 
            map_.erase(ret.first);
            map_.insert(std::pair<K, V>(key, value));
            return;
        
        return;
    

    bool Find(const K& key, V& value)
    
        bool ret = false;
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);

        auto iter = map_.find(key);
        if (iter != map_.end()) 
            value = iter->second;
            ret = true;
        

        return ret;
    

    bool FindOldAndSetNew(const K& key, V& oldValue, const V& newValue)
    
        bool ret = false;
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);
        if (map_.size() > 0) 
            auto iter = map_.find(key);
            if (iter != map_.end()) 
                oldValue = iter->second;
                map_.erase(iter);
                map_.insert(std::pair<K, V>(key, newValue));
                ret = true;
            
        

        return ret;
    

    void Erase(const K& key)
    
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);
        map_.erase(key);
    

    void Clear()
    
        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutex_);
        map_.clear();
        return;
    

private:
    std::mutex mutex_;
    std::map<K, V> map_;
;

 // namespace OHOS
#endif

源码欣赏

使用模板语法template <typename K, typename V>让这个map的实现更通用。这是c++模板泛型的强大之处,不用针对每个类型都实现一遍,复用性更强。且模板是在编译期检查的,也降低的出错的可能性。内部实现上,倒是没啥特别的,就是对相应的操作加了锁。锁使用的RAII模型的std::lock_guard写法,这种很常见也很常用。

自定义实现了几个常用的操作方法如Find,Erase和Clear,每个里面的操作都相应的加了锁。操作符重载实现了[]和赋值=操作。注意这两处的地方没有用锁,你知道为什么吗?如果多个线程只访问容器但不更改其结构,则不需要对容器进行同步。另外一个原因是,对于map,如果只是通过[]的方式修改而不是新插入,则多线程下也不会core dump。

单元测试

源码中同样有safe_map的单元测试,单元测试框架使用的是google的gtest。看来gtest还是很强大的,华为也选择使用了它。以下给出源码,可以熟悉下gtest单元测试的用法。

/*
 * Copyright (c) 2021 Huawei Device Co., Ltd.
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
#include "safe_map.h"

#include <array>
#include <future>
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>

#include <iostream>

#include <chrono> // std::chrono::seconds
#include <iostream> // std::cout
#include <thread> // std::thread, std::this_thread::sleep_for

using namespace testing::ext;
using namespace OHOS;
using namespace std;

class UtilsSafeMap : public testing::Test 
;

/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsCopyAndAssign001
 * @tc.desc: single thread test the normal feature insert and erase and EnsureInsert
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsCopyAndAssign001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    // insert new
    demoData.Insert("A", 1);
    ASSERT_FALSE(demoData.IsEmpty());
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 1);

    SafeMap<string, int> newdemo = demoData;
    int tar = -1;
    ASSERT_TRUE(newdemo.Find("A", tar));
    ASSERT_EQ(1, tar);

    tar = -1;
    SafeMap<string, int> newdemo2;
    newdemo2 = demoData;
    ASSERT_TRUE(newdemo2.Find("A", tar));
    ASSERT_EQ(1, tar);


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsoperator001
 * @tc.desc: SafeMap
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsoperator001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    // insert new
    demoData.Insert("A", 1);
    ASSERT_FALSE(demoData.IsEmpty());
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 1);
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData["A"], 1);

    SafeMap<string, int> newdemo = demoData;
    ASSERT_EQ(newdemo["A"], 1);

    int tar = -1;
    newdemo["B"] = 6;
    ASSERT_TRUE(newdemo.Find("B", tar));
    ASSERT_EQ(6, tar);

    SafeMap<string, int> newdemo2;
    newdemo2 = newdemo;
    ASSERT_EQ(newdemo2["A"], 1);


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsNormalFeatureInsert001
 * @tc.desc: SafeMap
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsNormalFeatureInsert001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.IsEmpty());
    // insert new
    demoData.Insert("A", 1);
    ASSERT_FALSE(demoData.IsEmpty());
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 1);

    // insert copy one should fail
    ASSERT_FALSE(demoData.Insert("A", 2));
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 1);


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsNormalFeatureEnsureInsert001
 * @tc.desc: SafeMap
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsNormalFeatureEnsureInsert001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.IsEmpty());

    demoData.Insert("A", 1);
    demoData.EnsureInsert("B", 2);

    ASSERT_FALSE(demoData.IsEmpty());
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 2);
    // insert copy one and new one
    demoData.EnsureInsert("B", 5);
    demoData.EnsureInsert("C", 6);

    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 3);


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsNormalFeatureFind001
 * @tc.desc: SafeMap
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsNormalFeatureFind001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.IsEmpty());

    demoData.Insert("A", 1);
    demoData.Insert("B", 10000);
    demoData.EnsureInsert("B", 2);
    demoData.EnsureInsert("C", 6);

    ASSERT_FALSE(demoData.IsEmpty());
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 3);

    int i = 0;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.Find("A", i));
    ASSERT_EQ(i, 1);
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.Find("B", i));
    ASSERT_EQ(i, 2);

    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.Find("C", i));
    ASSERT_EQ(i, 6);


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsNormalFeatureFindAndSet001
 * @tc.desc: SafeMap
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsNormalFeatureFindAndSet001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.IsEmpty());

    demoData.Insert("A", 1);
    demoData.EnsureInsert("B", 2);

    int oldvalue = 0;
    int newvalue = 3;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.FindOldAndSetNew("A", oldvalue, newvalue));
    // old value
    ASSERT_EQ(oldvalue, 1);

    newvalue = 4;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.FindOldAndSetNew("B", oldvalue, newvalue));
    // old value
    ASSERT_EQ(oldvalue, 2);
    int i = -1;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.Find("A", i));
    // new value
    ASSERT_EQ(i, 3);
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.Find("B", i));
    // new value
    ASSERT_EQ(i, 4);


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsNormalFeatureEraseAndClear001
 * @tc.desc: SafeMap
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsNormalFeatureEraseAndClear001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.IsEmpty());

    demoData.Insert("A", 1);
    demoData.EnsureInsert("B", 2);

    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 2);
    demoData.Erase("A");
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 1);

    demoData.Clear();
    ASSERT_EQ(demoData.Size(), 0);


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsConcurrentWriteAndRead001
 * @tc.desc: 100 threads test in writein to the same key of the map, while read at same time  and no throw
 */
const int THREAD_NUM = 100;
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsConcurrentWriteAndRead001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    std::thread threads[THREAD_NUM];
    std::thread checkThread[THREAD_NUM];
    ASSERT_NO_THROW(
        auto lamfuncInsert = [](SafeMap<string, int>& data, const string& key,
            const int& value, const std::chrono::system_clock::time_point& absTime) 
            std::this_thread::sleep_until(absTime);
            data.EnsureInsert(key, value);
        ;

        auto lamfuncCheck = [](SafeMap<string, int>& data, const string& key,
            std::chrono::system_clock::time_point absTime) 
            std::this_thread::sleep_until(absTime);
            thread_local int i = -1;
            data.Find(key, i);
        ;

        using std::chrono::system_clock;

        std::time_t timeT = system_clock::to_time_t(system_clock::now());
        timeT += 2;
        string key("A");

        for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; ++i) 
            threads[i] = std::thread(lamfuncInsert, std::ref(demoData), key, i, system_clock::from_time_t(timeT));
            checkThread[i] = std::thread(lamfuncCheck, std::ref(demoData), key, system_clock::from_time_t(timeT));
        

        std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(3));
        for (auto& t : threads) 
            t.join();
        

        for (auto& t : checkThread) 
            t.join();
        
    );


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsConcurrentWriteAndFind001
 * @tc.desc: 100 threads test in writein to the corresponding key of the map,
 * while read at same time  and check the results
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsConcurrentWriteAndFind001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    std::thread threads[THREAD_NUM];
    std::vector<std::future<int>> vcfi;

    ASSERT_NO_THROW(
        auto lamfuncInsert = [](SafeMap<string, int>& data, const string& key,
            const int& value, const std::chrono::system_clock::time_point& absTime) 
            std::this_thread::sleep_until(absTime);
            data.EnsureInsert(key, value);
        ;

        auto lamfuncCheckLoop = [](SafeMap<string, int>& data, const string& key,
            std::chrono::system_clock::time_point absTime) 
            std::this_thread::sleep_until(absTime);
            thread_local int i = -1;
            while (!data.Find(key, i)) 
                std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::microseconds(10));
            
            return i;
        ;

        using std::chrono::system_clock;

        std::time_t timeT = system_clock::to_time_t(system_clock::now());
        timeT += 2;
        string key("A");

        for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; ++i) 
            threads[i] = std::thread(lamfuncInsert, std::ref(demoData),
                key + std::to_string(i), i, system_clock::from_time_t(timeT));
            vcfi.push_back(std::async(std::launch::async, lamfuncCheckLoop,
                std::ref(demoData), key + std::to_string(i), system_clock::from_time_t(timeT)));
        

        std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(4));
        for (auto& t : threads) 
            t.join();
        

        vector<int> result;

        for (auto& t : vcfi) 
            result.push_back(t.get());
        

        std::sort(result.begin(), result.end());

        for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; ++i) 
            ASSERT_EQ(i, result[i]);
        
    );


/*
 * @tc.name: testUtilsConcurrentWriteAndFindAndSet001
 * @tc.desc: 100 threads test in writein to the corresponding key of the map,
 * while findandfix at same time  and check the results
 */
HWTEST_F(UtilsSafeMap, testUtilsConcurrentWriteAndFindAndSet001, TestSize.Level1)

    SafeMap<string, int> demoData;
    std::thread threads[THREAD_NUM];
    std::vector<std::future<int>> vcfi;

    ASSERT_NO_THROW(
        auto lamfuncInsert = [](SafeMap<string, int>& data, const string& key,
            const int& value, const std::chrono::system_clock::time_point& absTime) 
            std::this_thread::sleep_until(absTime);
            data.EnsureInsert(key, value);
        ;

        auto lamfuncCheckLoop = [](SafeMap<string, int>& data, const string& key,
            const int& newvalue, std::chrono::system_clock::time_point absTime) 
            std::this_thread::sleep_until(absTime);
            thread_local int i = -1;
            while (!data.FindOldAndSetNew(key, i, newvalue)) 
                std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::microseconds(10));
            
            return i;
        ;

        using std::chrono::system_clock;

        std::time_t timeT = system_clock::to_time_t(system_clock::now());
        timeT += 2;
        string key("A");

        for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; ++i) 
            threads[i] = std::thread(lamfuncInsert, std::ref(demoData),
                key + std::to_string(i), i, system_clock::from_time_t(timeT));
            vcfi.push_back(std::async(std::launch::async, lamfuncCheckLoop,
                std::ref(demoData), key + std::to_string(i), i + 1, system_clock::from_time_t(timeT)));
        

        std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(4));
        for (auto& t : threads) 
            t.join();
        

        vector<int> result;
        for (auto& t : vcfi) 
            result.push_back(t.get());
        

        std::sort(result.begin(), result.end());

        for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; ++i) 
            ASSERT_EQ(i, result[i]);
        

        int t = 0;
        result.clear();
        for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; ++i) 
            t = -1;
            ASSERT_TRUE(demoData.Find("A" + std::to_string(i), t));
            result.push_back(t);
        

        std::sort(result.begin(), result.end());

        for (int i = 0; i < THREAD_NUM; ++i) 
            ASSERT_EQ(i + 1, result[i]);
        
    );

引用

C++线程安全map (低效率) | 码农家园

C++11:基于std::queue和std::mutex构建一个线程安全的队列_10km的博客-CSDN博客_std::queue 线程安全

C++11:基于std::unordered_map和共享锁构建线程安全的map_10km的博客-CSDN博客_c++ map 无锁

如何设计并实现一个线程安全的 Map ?(上篇) - JavaShuo

c++线程安全的map_clh01s的博客-CSDN博客_c++ 线程安全的map

C++ 20 线程安全的Map_学习好烦啊的博客-CSDN博客_c++ map 线程安全

c++ map 多线程_线程安全原理简析及HashMap多线程并发5种场景异常分析_sumilao的博客-CSDN博客

C++ STL容器如何解决线程安全的问题? - 腾讯云开发者社区-腾讯云

RISC-V MCU中文社区_致力于RISC-V技术的推广,提供一个交流学习的开放平台

以上是关于C++ 实现线程安全的map(OpenHarmony源码实现版)的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章

std::map 和线程安全的奇怪问题

C++ 标准容器的线程安全

如何设计并实现一个线程安全的 Map

Golang实现线程安全的Map

转:golang实现线程安全的map

Go 实现线程安全 map 读写(sync.RWMutex)