ButterKnife编译时生成代码原理:butterknife-compiler源码分析
Posted Steadyoung
tags:
篇首语:本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理,主要介绍了ButterKnife编译时生成代码原理:butterknife-compiler源码分析相关的知识,希望对你有一定的参考价值。
1.butterknife-compiler介绍
上篇文章:注解框架源码分析(XUtils、ButterKnife),根据代码运行流程分析了xUtils和ButterKnife,ButterKnife最终实现注解方法的代码是通过编译运行时生成的,也就是gradle依赖中butterknife-compiler实现的:
dependencies
implementation 'com.jakewharton:butterknife:8.8.1'
annotationProcessor 'com.jakewharton:butterknife-compiler:8.8.1'
com.jakewharton:butterknife-compiler 就是自定义的注解处理器,我们在 Gradle 中注册使用它。
然而我在项目结构中找了很久也没有找到这个库的文件,有可能是在编译时才去访问的,如果需要可以在 GitHub 中找到:
butterknife-compiler
2.butterknife-compiler源码分析
我们看看ButterKnifeProcessor这个类:
@Override public synchronized void init(ProcessingEnvironment env)
super.init(env);
String sdk = env.getOptions().get(OPTION_SDK_INT);
if (sdk != null)
try
this.sdk = Integer.parseInt(sdk);
catch (NumberFormatException e)
env.getMessager()
.printMessage(Kind.WARNING, "Unable to parse supplied minSdk option '"
+ sdk
+ "'. Falling back to API 1 support.");
debuggable = !"false".equals(env.getOptions().get(OPTION_DEBUGGABLE));
elementUtils = env.getElementUtils();
typeUtils = env.getTypeUtils();
filer = env.getFiler();
try
trees = Trees.instance(processingEnv);
catch (IllegalArgumentException ignored)
int()方法里面进来判断了最低的支持的sdk版本。ProcessingEnviroment参数提供很多有用的工具类Elements, Types和Filer。Types是用来处理TypeMirror的工具类,Filer用来创建生成辅助文件。至于ElementUtils嘛,其实ButterKnifeProcessor在运行的时候,会扫描所有的Java源文件,然后每一个Java源文件的每一个部分都是一个Element,比如一个包、类或者方法。
@Override public Set<String> getSupportedAnnotationTypes()
Set<String> types = new LinkedHashSet<>();
for (Class<? extends Annotation> annotation : getSupportedAnnotations())
types.add(annotation.getCanonicalName());
return types;
private Set<Class<? extends Annotation>> getSupportedAnnotations()
Set<Class<? extends Annotation>> annotations = new LinkedHashSet<>();
annotations.add(BindAnim.class);
annotations.add(BindArray.class);
annotations.add(BindBitmap.class);
annotations.add(BindBool.class);
annotations.add(BindColor.class);
annotations.add(BindDimen.class);
annotations.add(BindDrawable.class);
annotations.add(BindFloat.class);
annotations.add(BindFont.class);
annotations.add(BindInt.class);
annotations.add(BindString.class);
annotations.add(BindView.class);
annotations.add(BindViews.class);
annotations.addAll(LISTENERS);
return annotations;
getSupportedAnnotationTypes()方法主要是指定ButterknifeProcessor是注册给哪些注解的。我们可以看到,在源代码里面,作者一个一个地把Class文件加到那个LinkedHashSet里面,然后再把LISTENERS也全部加进去。
其实整个类最重要的是process方法:
@Override public boolean process(Set<? extends TypeElement> elements, RoundEnvironment env)
Map<TypeElement, BindingSet> bindingMap = findAndParseTargets(env);
for (Map.Entry<TypeElement, BindingSet> entry : bindingMap.entrySet())
TypeElement typeElement = entry.getKey();
BindingSet binding = entry.getValue();
JavaFile javaFile = binding.brewJava(sdk, debuggable);
try
javaFile.writeTo(filer);
catch (IOException e)
error(typeElement, "Unable to write binding for type %s: %s", typeElement, e.getMessage());
return false;
这个方法的作用主要是扫描、评估和处理我们程序中的注解,然后生成Java文件,也就是前面说的MainActivity_ViewBinding。首先一进这个函数就调用了findAndParseTargets方法,我们就去看看findAndParseTargets方法到底做了什么:
private Map<TypeElement, BindingSet> findAndParseTargets(RoundEnvironment env)
Map<TypeElement, BindingSet.Builder> builderMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
Set<TypeElement> erasedTargetNames = new LinkedHashSet<>();
scanForRClasses(env);
// Process each @BindAnim element.
for (Element element : env.getElementsAnnotatedWith(BindAnim.class))
if (!SuperficialValidation.validateElement(element)) continue;
try
parseResourceAnimation(element, builderMap, erasedTargetNames);
catch (Exception e)
logParsingError(element, BindAnim.class, e);
........
........
........
// Associate superclass binders with their subclass binders. This is a queue-based tree walk
// which starts at the roots (superclasses) and walks to the leafs (subclasses).
Deque<Map.Entry<TypeElement, BindingSet.Builder>> entries =
new ArrayDeque<>(builderMap.entrySet());
Map<TypeElement, BindingSet> bindingMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
while (!entries.isEmpty())
Map.Entry<TypeElement, BindingSet.Builder> entry = entries.removeFirst();
TypeElement type = entry.getKey();
BindingSet.Builder builder = entry.getValue();
TypeElement parentType = findParentType(type, erasedTargetNames);
if (parentType == null)
bindingMap.put(type, builder.build());
else
BindingSet parentBinding = bindingMap.get(parentType);
if (parentBinding != null)
builder.setParent(parentBinding);
bindingMap.put(type, builder.build());
else
// Has a superclass binding but we haven't built it yet. Re-enqueue for later.
entries.addLast(entry);
return bindingMap;
这个方法的代码非常多,这里只贴出一部分,这个方法的主要的流程如下:
扫描所有具有注解的类,然后根据这些类的信息生成BindingSet,最后生成以TypeElement为键,BindingSet为值的键值对。
循环遍历这个键值对,根据TypeElement和BindingSet里面的信息生成对应的java类。例如AnnotationActivity生成的类即为MainActivity_ViewBinding类。
这里我们可以看看BindingSet里面的代码:
final class BindingSet
static final ClassName UTILS = ClassName.get("butterknife.internal", "Utils");
private static final ClassName VIEW = ClassName.get("android.view", "View");
private static final ClassName CONTEXT = ClassName.get("android.content", "Context");
private static final ClassName RESOURCES = ClassName.get("android.content.res", "Resources");
private static final ClassName UI_THREAD =
ClassName.get("android.support.annotation", "UiThread");
private static final ClassName CALL_SUPER =
ClassName.get("android.support.annotation", "CallSuper");
private static final ClassName SUPPRESS_LINT =
ClassName.get("android.annotation", "SuppressLint");
private static final ClassName UNBINDER = ClassName.get("butterknife", "Unbinder");
static final ClassName BITMAP_FACTORY = ClassName.get("android.graphics", "BitmapFactory");
static final ClassName CONTEXT_COMPAT =
ClassName.get("android.support.v4.content", "ContextCompat");
static final ClassName ANIMATION_UTILS =
ClassName.get("android.view.animation", "AnimationUtils");
private final TypeName targetTypeName;
private final ClassName bindingClassName;
private final boolean isFinal;
private final boolean isView;
private final boolean isActivity;
private final boolean isDialog;
private final ImmutableList<ViewBinding> viewBindings;
private final ImmutableList<FieldCollectionViewBinding> collectionBindings;
private final ImmutableList<ResourceBinding> resourceBindings;
private final BindingSet parentBinding;
private BindingSet(TypeName targetTypeName, ClassName bindingClassName, boolean isFinal,
boolean isView, boolean isActivity, boolean isDialog, ImmutableList<ViewBinding> viewBindings,
ImmutableList<FieldCollectionViewBinding> collectionBindings,
ImmutableList<ResourceBinding> resourceBindings, BindingSet parentBinding)
this.isFinal = isFinal;
this.targetTypeName = targetTypeName;
this.bindingClassName = bindingClassName;
this.isView = isView;
this.isActivity = isActivity;
this.isDialog = isDialog;
this.viewBindings = viewBindings;
this.collectionBindings = collectionBindings;
this.resourceBindings = resourceBindings;
this.parentBinding = parentBinding;
JavaFile brewJava(int sdk, boolean debuggable)
return JavaFile.builder(bindingClassName.packageName(), createType(sdk, debuggable))
.addFileComment("Generated code from Butter Knife. Do not modify!")
.build();
private TypeSpec createType(int sdk, boolean debuggable)
TypeSpec.Builder result = TypeSpec.classBuilder(bindingClassName.simpleName())
.addModifiers(PUBLIC);
if (isFinal)
result.addModifiers(FINAL);
........
........
........
static final class Builder
private final TypeName targetTypeName;
private final ClassName bindingClassName;
private final boolean isFinal;
private final boolean isView;
private final boolean isActivity;
private final boolean isDialog;
private BindingSet parentBinding;
private final Map<Id, ViewBinding.Builder> viewIdMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
private final ImmutableList.Builder<FieldCollectionViewBinding> collectionBindings =
ImmutableList.builder();
private final ImmutableList.Builder<ResourceBinding> resourceBindings = ImmutableList.builder();
private Builder(TypeName targetTypeName, ClassName bindingClassName, boolean isFinal,
boolean isView, boolean isActivity, boolean isDialog)
this.targetTypeName = targetTypeName;
this.bindingClassName = bindingClassName;
this.isFinal = isFinal;
this.isView = isView;
this.isActivity = isActivity;
this.isDialog = isDialog;
void addField(Id id, FieldViewBinding binding)
getOrCreateViewBindings(id).setFieldBinding(binding);
void addFieldCollection(FieldCollectionViewBinding binding)
collectionBindings.add(binding);
boolean addMethod(
Id id,
ListenerClass listener,
ListenerMethod method,
MethodViewBinding binding)
ViewBinding.Builder viewBinding = getOrCreateViewBindings(id);
if (viewBinding.hasMethodBinding(listener, method) && !"void".equals(method.returnType()))
return false;
viewBinding.addMethodBinding(listener, method, binding);
return true;
void addResource(ResourceBinding binding)
resourceBindings.add(binding);
void setParent(BindingSet parent)
this.parentBinding = parent;
String findExistingBindingName(Id id)
ViewBinding.Builder builder = viewIdMap.get(id);
if (builder == null)
return null;
FieldViewBinding fieldBinding = builder.fieldBinding;
if (fieldBinding == null)
return null;
return fieldBinding.getName();
private ViewBinding.Builder getOrCreateViewBindings(Id id)
ViewBinding.Builder viewId = viewIdMap.get(id);
if (viewId == null)
viewId = new ViewBinding.Builder(id);
viewIdMap.put(id, viewId);
return viewId;
BindingSet build()
ImmutableList.Builder<ViewBinding> viewBindings = ImmutableList.builder();
for (ViewBinding.Builder builder : viewIdMap.values())
viewBindings.add(builder.build());
return new BindingSet(targetTypeName, bindingClassName, isFinal, isView, isActivity, isDialog,
viewBindings.build(), collectionBindings.build(), resourceBindings.build(),
parentBinding);
这个类的代码也非常多,所以我们也只贴一部分,可以自己去看看源码,这个BindingSet是管理了所有关于这个注解的一些信息还有实例本身的信息。
因为我们之前用的例子是绑定的一个View,所以我们就只贴了解析View的代码。好吧,这里遍历了所有带有@BindView的Element,然后对每一个Element进行解析,也就进入了parseBindView这个方法中:
private void parseBindView(Element element, Map<TypeElement, BindingSet.Builder> builderMap,
Set<TypeElement> erasedTargetNames)
TypeElement enclosingElement = (TypeElement) element.getEnclosingElement();
// Start by verifying common generated code restrictions.
boolean hasError = isInaccessibleViaGeneratedCode(BindView.class, "fields", element)
|| isBindingInWrongPackage(BindView.class, element);
// Verify that the target type extends from View.
TypeMirror elementType = element.asType();
if (elementType.getKind() == TypeKind.TYPEVAR)
TypeVariable typeVariable = (TypeVariable) elementType;
elementType = typeVariable.getUpperBound();
Name qualifiedName = enclosingElement.getQualifiedName();
Name simpleName = element.getSimpleName();
if (!isSubtypeOfType(elementType, VIEW_TYPE) && !isInterface(elementType))
if (elementType.getKind() == TypeKind.ERROR)
note(element, "@%s field with unresolved type (%s) "
+ "must elsewhere be generated as a View or interface. (%s.%s)",
BindView.class.getSimpleName(), elementType, qualifiedName, simpleName);
else
error(element, "@%s fields must extend from View or be an interface. (%s.%s)",
BindView.class.getSimpleName(), qualifiedName, simpleName);
hasError = true;
if (hasError)
return;
// Assemble information on the field.
int id = element.getAnnotation(BindView.class).value();
BindingSet.Builder builder = builderMap.get(enclosingElement);
QualifiedId qualifiedId = elementToQualifiedId(element, id);
if (builder != null)
String existingBindingName = builder.findExistingBindingName(getId(qualifiedId));
if (existingBindingName != null)
error(element, "Attempt to use @%s for an already bound ID %d on '%s'. (%s.%s)",
BindView.class.getSimpleName(), id, existingBindingName,
enclosingElement.getQualifiedName(), element.getSimpleName());
return;
else
builder = getOrCreateBindingBuilder(builderMap, enclosingElement);
String name = simpleName.toString();
TypeName type = TypeName.get(elementType);
boolean required = isFieldRequired(element);
builder.addField(getId(qualifiedId), new FieldViewBinding(name, type, required));
// Add the type-erased version to the valid binding targets set.
erasedTargetNames.add(enclosingElement);
然后这里从一进入这个方法到
int id = element.getAnnotation(BindView.class).value();
都是在拿到注解信息,然后验证注解的target的类型是否继承自view,然后上面这一行代码获得我们要绑定的View的id,再从builderMap里面取出BindingSet.Builder对象(这个BindingSet是管理了所有关于这个注解的一些信息还有实例本身的信息,其实最后是通过BindingSet来生成java代码的,上面也已经看了BindingSet的代码),如果builderMap里面不存在的话,就在
builder = getOrCreateBindingBuilder(builderMap, enclosingElement);
这里生成一个,我们进去看一下getOrCreateBindingBuilder:
private BindingSet.Builder getOrCreateBindingBuilder(
Map<TypeElement, BindingSet.Builder> builderMap, TypeElement enclosingElement)
BindingSet.Builder builder = builderMap.get(enclosingElement);
if (builder == null)
builder = BindingSet.newBuilder(enclosingElement);
builderMap.put(enclosingElement, builder);
return builder;
这里面其实很简单,就是获取一些这个注解所修饰的变量的一些信息,然后把这个解析后的builder加入到builderMap里面。
返回刚刚的parseBindView中,根据view的信息生成一个FieldViewBinding,最后添加到上边生成的builder实例中。这里基本完成了解析工作。最后回到findAndParseTargets中:
// Associate superclass binders with their subclass binders. This is a queue-based tree walk
// which starts at the roots (superclasses) and walks to the leafs (subclasses).
Deque<Map.Entry<TypeElement, BindingSet.Builder>> entries =
new ArrayDeque<>(builderMap.entrySet());
Map<TypeElement, BindingSet> bindingMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
while (!entries.isEmpty())
Map.Entry<TypeElement, BindingSet.Builder> entry = entries.removeFirst();
TypeElement type = entry.getKey();
BindingSet.Builder builder = entry.getValue();
TypeElement parentType = findParentType(type, erasedTargetNames);
if (parentType == null)
bindingMap.put(type, builder.build());
else
BindingSet parentBinding = bindingMap.get(parentType);
if (parentBinding != null)
builder.setParent(parentBinding);
bindingMap.put(type, builder.build());
else
// Has a superclass binding but we haven't built it yet. Re-enqueue for later.
entries.addLast(entry);
这里主要的工作是建立上面的绑定的所有的实例的解绑的关系,因为我们绑定了,最后在代码中还是会解绑的。这里预先处理好了这些关系。
回到我们的process中, 现在解析完了annotation,该生成java文件了,再看看代码:
@Override public boolean process(Set<? extends TypeElement> elements, RoundEnvironment env)
Map<TypeElement, BindingSet> bindingMap = findAndParseTargets(env);
for (Map.Entry<TypeElement, BindingSet> entry : bindingMap.entrySet())
TypeElement typeElement = entry.getKey();
BindingSet binding = entry.getValue();
JavaFile javaFile = binding.brewJava(sdk, debuggable);
try
javaFile.writeTo(filer);
catch (IOException e)
error(typeElement, "Unable to write binding for type %s: %s", typeElement, e.getMessage());
return false;
遍历刚刚得到的bindingMap,然后再一个一个地通过
javaFile.writeTo(filer);
来生成java文件。然而生成的java文件也是根据上面的信息来用字符串拼接起来的,然而这个工作在brewJava()中完成了:
JavaFile brewJava(int sdk, boolean debuggable)
return JavaFile.builder(bindingClassName.packageName(), createType(sdk, debuggable))
.addFileComment("Generated code from Butter Knife. Do not modify!")
.build();
最后通过writeTo(Filer filer)生成java源文件。
以上是关于ButterKnife编译时生成代码原理:butterknife-compiler源码分析的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章
Android APT编译时技术 ( ButterKnife 原理分析 )