Java死锁范例以及如何分析死锁（转载自ImportNew）

Posted KIKI_FAN

tags:

篇首语：本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理，主要介绍了Java死锁范例以及如何分析死锁（转载自ImportNew）相关的知识，希望对你有一定的参考价值。

本文由 ImportNew - 范琦琦 翻译自 journaldev。欢迎加入翻译小组。转载请见文末要求。

死锁是两个甚至多个线程被永久阻塞时的一种运行局面，这种局面的生成伴随着至少两个线程和两个或者多个资源。在这里我已写好一个简单的程序，它将会引起死锁方案然后我们就会明白如何分析它。

Java死锁范例

ThreadDeadlock.java

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
package com.journaldev.threads;
 
public class ThreadDeadlock {
 
    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
        Object obj1 = new Object();
        Object obj2 = new Object();
        Object obj3 = new Object();
 
        Thread t1 = new Thread(new SyncThread(obj1, obj2), "t1");
        Thread t2 = new Thread(new SyncThread(obj2, obj3), "t2");
        Thread t3 = new Thread(new SyncThread(obj3, obj1), "t3");
 
        t1.start();
        Thread.sleep(5000);
        t2.start();
        Thread.sleep(5000);
        t3.start();
 
    }
 
}
 
class SyncThread implements Runnable{
    private Object obj1;
    private Object obj2;
 
    public SyncThread(Object o1, Object o2){
        this.obj1=o1;
        this.obj2=o2;
    }
    @Override
    public void run() {
        String name = Thread.currentThread().getName();
        System.out.println(name + " acquiring lock on "+obj1);
        synchronized (obj1) {
         System.out.println(name + " acquired lock on "+obj1);
         work();
         System.out.println(name + " acquiring lock on "+obj2);
         synchronized (obj2) {
            System.out.println(name + " acquired lock on "+obj2);
            work();
        }
         System.out.println(name + " released lock on "+obj2);
        }
        System.out.println(name + " released lock on "+obj1);
        System.out.println(name + " finished execution.");
    }
    private void work() {
        try {
            Thread.sleep(30000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

在上面的程序中同步线程正完成Runnable的接口，它工作的是两个对象，这两个对象向对方寻求死锁而且都在使用同步阻塞。

在主函数中，我使用了三个为同步线程运行的线程，而且在其中每个线程中都有一个可共享的资源。

这些线程以向第一个对象获取封锁这种方式运行。但是当它试着像第二个对象获取封锁时，它就会进入等待状态，因为它已经被另一个线程封锁住了。这样，在线程引起死锁的过程中，就形成了一个依赖于资源的循环。

当我执行上面的程序时，就产生了输出，但是程序却因为死锁无法停止。

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
t1 acquiring lock on [email protected]
t1 acquired lock on [email protected]
t2 acquiring lock on [email protected]
t2 acquired lock on [email protected]
t3 acquiring lock on [email protected]
t3 acquired lock on [email protected]
t1 acquiring lock on [email protected]
t2 acquiring lock on [email protected]
t3 acquiring lock on [email protected]

在此我们可以清楚地在输出结果中辨认出死锁局面，但是在我们实际生活所用的应用中，发现死锁并将它排除是非常难的。

分析死锁

为了分析一个死锁，我们需要关注下应用中的Java线程转存，在上一节中我已经解释了如何使用VisualVM收集资料或者jstack应用程序产生线程转存。

以下就是上述程序的线程转存。

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
2012-12-27 19:08:34
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.5-b02 mixed mode):
 
"Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2814000 nid=0x4007 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
 
"DestroyJavaVM" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2801000 nid=0x1703 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
 
"t3" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a204b000 nid=0x4d07 waiting for monitor entry [0x000000015d971000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
    at com.journaldev.threads.SyncThread.run(ThreadDeadlock.java:41)
    - waiting to lock <0x000000013df2f658> (a java.lang.Object)
    - locked <0x000000013df2f678> (a java.lang.Object)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
 
"t2" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a1073000 nid=0x4207 waiting for monitor entry [0x000000015d209000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
    at com.journaldev.threads.SyncThread.run(ThreadDeadlock.java:41)
    - waiting to lock <0x000000013df2f678> (a java.lang.Object)
    - locked <0x000000013df2f668> (a java.lang.Object)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
 
"t1" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a1072000 nid=0x5503 waiting for monitor entry [0x000000015d86e000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
    at com.journaldev.threads.SyncThread.run(ThreadDeadlock.java:41)
    - waiting to lock <0x000000013df2f668> (a java.lang.Object)
    - locked <0x000000013df2f658> (a java.lang.Object)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
 
"Service Thread" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a1038000 nid=0x5303 runnable [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
 
"C2 CompilerThread1" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a1037000 nid=0x5203 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
 
"C2 CompilerThread0" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a1016000 nid=0x5103 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
 
"Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a4003000 nid=0x5003 runnable [0x0000000000000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
 
"Finalizer" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a4800000 nid=0x3f03 in Object.wait() [0x000000015d0c0000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
    at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
    - waiting on <0x000000013de75798> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
    at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:135)
    - locked <0x000000013de75798> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
    at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:151)
    at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:177)
 
"Reference Handler" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a4002000 nid=0x3e03 in Object.wait() [0x000000015cfbd000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
    at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
    - waiting on <0x000000013de75320> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
    at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503)
    at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133)
    - locked <0x000000013de75320> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
 
"VM Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2049800 nid=0x3d03 runnable
 
"GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a300d800 nid=0x3503 runnable
 
"GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2001800 nid=0x3603 runnable
 
"GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2003800 nid=0x3703 runnable
 
"GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2004000 nid=0x3803 runnable
 
"GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2005000 nid=0x3903 runnable
 
"GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2005800 nid=0x3a03 runnable
 
"GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2006000 nid=0x3b03 runnable
 
"GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a2006800 nid=0x3c03 runnable
 
"VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007fb0a1015000 nid=0x5403 waiting on condition
 
JNI global references: 114
 
Found one Java-level deadlock:
=============================
"t3":
  waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb0a1074b08 (object 0x000000013df2f658, a java.lang.Object),
  which is held by "t1"
"t1":
  waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb0a1010f08 (object 0x000000013df2f668, a java.lang.Object),
  which is held by "t2"
"t2":
  waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb0a1012360 (object 0x000000013df2f678, a java.lang.Object),
  which is held by "t3"
 
Java stack information for the threads listed above:
===================================================
"t3":
    at com.journaldev.threads.SyncThread.run(ThreadDeadlock.java:41)
    - waiting to lock <0x000000013df2f658> (a java.lang.Object)
    - locked <0x000000013df2f678> (a java.lang.Object)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
"t1":
    at com.journaldev.threads.SyncThread.run(ThreadDeadlock.java:41)
    - waiting to lock <0x000000013df2f668> (a java.lang.Object)
    - locked <0x000000013df2f658> (a java.lang.Object)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
"t2":
    at com.journaldev.threads.SyncThread.run(ThreadDeadlock.java:41)
    - waiting to lock <0x000000013df2f678> (a java.lang.Object)
    - locked <0x000000013df2f668> (a java.lang.Object)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
 
Found 1 deadlock.

这三个线程转存的输出清楚地说明了死锁环境和线程，以及包含死锁环境的资源。

为了分析死锁，我们需要关注死锁状态的线程，然后资源再等待去封锁，每一个资源都有一个独特的ID，有了这个ID我们就能发现是哪一个进程已经封锁住对象。举个例子，线程“t3”正在等待封锁0x000000013df2f658,但是它已经被线程“t1”封锁住了。

当我们分析死锁环境的时候，如果发现线程正在引起死锁，这是我们就要改变代码来避免死锁的产生。

避免死锁

有很多方针可供我们使用来避免死锁的局面。

  • 避免嵌套封锁：这是死锁最主要的原因的，如果你已经有一个资源了就要避免封锁另一个资源。如果你运行时只有一个对象封锁，那是几乎不可能出现一个死锁局面的。例如，这里是另一个运行中没有嵌套封锁的run()方法，而且程序运行没有死锁局面，运行得很成功。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
public void run() {
    String name = Thread.currentThread().getName();
    System.out.println(name + " acquiring lock on " + obj1);
    synchronized (obj1) {
        System.out.println(name + " acquired lock on " + obj1);
        work();
    }
    System.out.println(name + " released lock on " + obj1);
    System.out.println(name + " acquiring lock on " + obj2);
    synchronized (obj2) {
        System.out.println(name + " acquired lock on " + obj2);
        work();
    }
    System.out.println(name + " released lock on " + obj2);
 
    System.out.println(name + " finished execution.");
}
  • 只对有请求的进行封锁：你应当只想你要运行的资源获取封锁，比如在上述程序中我在封锁的完全的对象资源。但是如果我们只对它所属领域中的一个感兴趣，那我们应当封锁住那个特殊的领域而并非完全的对象。
  • 避免无限期的等待：如果两个线程正在等待对象结束，无限期的使用线程加入，如果你的线程必须要等待另一个线程的结束，若是等待进程的结束加入最好准备最长时间。

原文链接： journaldev 翻译： ImportNew.com - 范琦琦
译文链接： http://www.importnew.com/9668.html
[ 转载请保留原文出处、译者和译文链接。]

关于作者： 范琦琦





以上是关于Java死锁范例以及如何分析死锁（转载自ImportNew）的主要内容，如果未能解决你的问题，请参考以下文章

Java 死锁以及如何避免？

Java线程和多线程——死锁

阿里二面：怎么解决MySQL死锁问题的？

java学习笔记 死锁

多线程之死锁定位及故障分析，尽可能避免线上事故（十三）

死锁问题分析的利器——valgrind的DRD和Helgrind