与死锁活锁和饥饿的哲学家一起吃饭
Posted
技术标签:
【中文标题】与死锁活锁和饥饿的哲学家一起吃饭【英文标题】:dining philosophers with deadlock livelock and starvation 【发布时间】:2020-09-14 21:31:01 【问题描述】:这是 geeksforgeeks 使用信号量解决哲学家就餐问题的解决方案:
#include <pthread.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define N 5
#define THINKING 2
#define HUNGRY 1
#define EATING 0
#define LEFT (phnum + 4) % N
#define RIGHT (phnum + 1) % N
int state[N];
int phil[N] = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 ;
sem_t mutex;
sem_t S[N];
void test(int phnum)
if (state[phnum] == HUNGRY
&& state[LEFT] != EATING
&& state[RIGHT] != EATING)
// state that eating
state[phnum] = EATING;
sleep(2);
printf("Philosopher %d takes fork %d and %d\n",
phnum + 1, LEFT + 1, phnum + 1);
printf("Philosopher %d is Eating\n", phnum + 1);
// sem_post(&S[phnum]) has no effect
// during takefork
// used to wake up hungry philosophers
// during putfork
sem_post(&S[phnum]);
// take up chopsticks
void take_fork(int phnum)
sem_wait(&mutex);
// state that hungry
state[phnum] = HUNGRY;
printf("Philosopher %d is Hungry\n", phnum + 1);
// eat if neighbours are not eating
test(phnum);
sem_post(&mutex);
// if unable to eat wait to be signalled
sem_wait(&S[phnum]);
sleep(1);
// put down chopsticks
void put_fork(int phnum)
sem_wait(&mutex);
// state that thinking
state[phnum] = THINKING;
printf("Philosopher %d putting fork %d and %d down\n",
phnum + 1, LEFT + 1, phnum + 1);
printf("Philosopher %d is thinking\n", phnum + 1);
test(LEFT);
test(RIGHT);
sem_post(&mutex);
void* philospher(void* num)
while (1)
int* i = num;
sleep(1);
take_fork(*i);
sleep(0);
put_fork(*i);
int main()
int i;
pthread_t thread_id[N];
// initialize the mutexes
sem_init(&mutex, 0, 1);
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
sem_init(&S[i], 0, 0);
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
// create philosopher processes
pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL,
philospher, &phil[i]);
printf("Philosopher %d is thinking\n", i + 1);
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
pthread_join(thread_id[i], NULL);
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dining-philosopher-problem-using-semaphores/
此代码发生死锁活锁和饥饿的概率很低, 我想改变它,它很有可能会出现死锁、活锁或饥饿, 我怎样才能做到这一点?
还有我如何确保此解决方案 100%(如果可能)不会出现任何这些问题
【问题讨论】:
【参考方案1】:好的,首先,我所知道的哲学家就餐问题的最佳解决方案是这个(来自现代操作系统 - Tannebaum 和 Bos 的第 4 版):
#define TRUE 1
#define N 5
#define LEFT (i+N-1)%N
#define RIGHT (i+1)%N
#define THINKING 0
#define HUNGRY 1
#define EATING 2
typedef int semaphore;
int state[N];
semaphore mutex = 1;
semaphore s[N];
void
philosopher(int i)
while(TRUE)
think();
take_forks(i);
eat();
put_forks(i)
void
take_forks(int i)
down(&mutex);
state[i] = HUNGRY;
test(i);
up(&mutex);
down(&s[i]);
void
put_forks(i)
down(&mutex);
state[i] = THINKING;
test(LEFT);
test(RIGHT);
up(&mutex);
void
test(int i)
if(state[i] == HUNGRY && state[LEFT] != EATING && state[RIGHT] != EATING)
state[i] = EATING;
up(&s[i]);
为了简单起见,省略了原型和一些功能,但重点是,如果你想创建一个完全不安全的用餐哲学家,解决方案是这样的:
#define N 5
void philosopher(int i)
while(TRUE)
think();
take_fork(i);
take_fork((i+1)%N);
eat();
put_fork(i);
put_fork((i+1)%N);
解释:
这个程序很容易产生竞争条件,事实上两个哲学家会使用同一个叉子,这是因为我们不使用信号量等待轮到我们吃饭,它也会产生饥饿,因为我们不使用test()
检查是否有人已经在使用我们的 fork,所以如果你想修改你的程序以解决这个问题,你应该删除 test()
以及你使用信号量和任何类型的测试的所有代码。
【讨论】:
以上是关于与死锁活锁和饥饿的哲学家一起吃饭的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章