Convert Application Model Differences

Posted foreach

tags:

篇首语:本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理,主要介绍了Convert Application Model Differences相关的知识,希望对你有一定的参考价值。

 

 

The eXpressApp Framework is based on the modules concept. As a rule, every module implements a certain feature. Entities implemented in a module, such as persistent classes or extra Application Model nodes - can be customized by users of the application via the Model Editor. Such customizations are saved as Application Model differences in XafML files. Legacy Application Model differences might pose a problem when a module is updated to a new version, and its internal structure is changed. So, developers implementing modules should provide means to convert Application Model differences with new versions. The eXpressApp Frameworkprovides easy ways to implement such converters. This topic describes them.

Basically, Application Model differences are converted in two steps.

  1. The XafML files stored in XML format can be processed by a module implementing the IModelXmlConverter interface. This step allows the application to start correctly, where otherwise, legacy Application Model differences would cause an exception at the application start. In simple conversion scenarios, this may be the only required step.
  2. For complex conversion scenarios, special updaters implementing the IModelNodeUpdater<T> interface should be used. Such updaters can perform much more versatile conversions.

Depending on a particular scenario, you may need to perform either both of these steps or just one. So, for example, in one scenario you may need to implement an XML converter, so that the application could start, and a node updater, to perform a complex conversion. In other scenarios, you may need to implement only an XML converter or a node updater.

 

技术分享 Implement an XML converter

 

 

An XML converter is represented by a module implementing the IModelXmlConverter interface. The interface declares the IModelXmlConverter.ConvertXml method, which is invoked for each node customized in Application Model differences. The method takes the ConvertXmlParameters object, supplying differences as a parameter. You can handle changes to a node in the method‘s body, by converting differences and making them correspond to the actual model. Consider the following example.

Suppose your application uses a module which adds an OperatingMode string property to the Application Model‘s Options node. This property is designed to take either a "Simple" or "Complex" word as a value. Originally, the module extends the Application Model in the following way:

C#
VB
 
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;

public interface IModelMyOptions{
    string OperatingMode { get; set; }
}
public sealed partial class MyModule : ModuleBase {
    //... 
    public override void ExtendModelInterfaces(ModelInterfaceExtenders extenders) {
        base.ExtendModelInterfaces(extenders);
        extenders.Add<IModelOptions, IModelMyOptions>();
    }
}

Users of your application customize this property value and it is stored to their Application Model differences. Then, the module is updated to a new version which introduces a couple of changes. First, the OperatingMode property type is changed to a newly introduced enumeration. Second, string representations of the new enumeration values are different from the previously used string values:

C#
VB
 
public interface IModelMyOptions {
    OperatingMode OperatingMode { get; set; }
}
public enum OperatingMode { Basic, Advanced }

If you now recompile the application with the updated module and redistribute it, existing users will not be able to use the application. At the application start, a message will be displayed stating that an error has occurred while loading the Application Model differences. To avoid this, an XML converter should be implemented in the module. The following code snippet illustrates a possible solution:

C#
VB
 
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Updating;

public sealed partial class MyModule : ModuleBase, IModelXmlConverter {
    //... 
    public void ConvertXml(ConvertXmlParameters parameters) {
        if(typeof(IModelOptions).IsAssignableFrom(parameters.NodeType)) {
            string property = "OperatingMode";
            if(parameters.ContainsKey(property)) {
                string value = parameters.Values[property];
                if(!Enum.IsDefined(typeof(OperatingMode), value)) {
                    switch(value.ToLower()) {
                        case "complex":
                            parameters.Values[property] = OperatingMode.Advanced.ToString();
                            break;
                        default:
                            parameters.Values[property] = OperatingMode.Basic.ToString();
                            break;                            
                    }                                  
                }                    
            }
        }
    }
}

The converter checks whether the currently processed node is the Options node. If it is, the converter checks whether the OperatingMode property has a legacy value. Then, the "Complex" value becomes OperatingMode.Advanced and all other values become OperatingMode.Basic.

Now, consider another very common scenario when a node‘s property is renamed. Suppose, a Mode property declared in the Options node was renamed to OperatingMode. The following code snippet illustrates a possible XML converter:

C#
VB
 
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Updating;

public sealed partial class MyModule : ModuleBase, IModelXmlConverter {
    //... 
    public void ConvertXml(ConvertXmlParameters parameters) {
        if(typeof(IModelOptions).IsAssignableFrom(parameters.NodeType)) {
            string oldProperty = "Mode";
            string newProperty = "OperatingMode";
            if(parameters.ContainsKey(oldProperty)) {
                parameters.Values[newProperty] = parameters.Values[oldProperty];
                parameters.Values.Remove(oldProperty);
            }
        }
    }
}

As illustrated by the examples, an XML converter works with one node at a time. So, complex conversions, affecting several nodes at once, are not possible. In these cases, special updaters implementing the IModelNodeUpdater<T> interface should be used.

 

 

技术分享 Implement a Node Updater

 

 

A node updater is represented by a class implementing the IModelNodeUpdater<T> interface. The generic type parameter specifies the type of the nodes for which the updater is intended. The interface declares a single IModelNodeUpdater<T>.UpdateNode method, which takes two parameters. The first parameter is the Application Model node in process, represented by an object implementing the IModelNode interface. The second parameter is the application‘s Application Model, represented by an object, implementing the IModelApplication interface. Since you have access to the whole Application Model, complex conversions affecting multiple nodes can be performed. Consider the following example.

Suppose your application uses a module which adds an OperatingMode string property to the Application Model‘s Options node. Originally, the interface extending the Application Model looks like this:

C#
VB
 
public interface IModelMyOptions {
    OperatingMode OperatingMode { get; set; }
}
public enum OperatingMode { Basic, Advanced }

Then, the module is updated to a new version which moves the property to a newly introduced child node:

C#
VB
 
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;

public interface IModelMyOptions {
    IModelChildOptions ChildOptions { get; }
}
public interface IModelChildOptions : IModelNode {
    OperatingMode OperatingMode { get; set; }
}
public enum OperatingMode { Basic, Advanced }

If you now recompile the application with the updated module and redistribute it, the original OperatingMode property values specified by users of the application will be lost. To avoid this, a node updater should be implemented. A possible place for the implementation is the updated module:

C#
VB
 
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model.Core;

public sealed partial class MyModule : ModuleBase, IModelNodeUpdater<IModelOptions> {
    //... 
    public void UpdateNode(IModelOptions node, IModelApplication application) {
        string myProperty = "OperatingMode";
        if(node.HasValue(myProperty)) {
            string value = node.GetValue<string>(myProperty);
            node.ClearValue(myProperty);
            ((IModelMyOptions)node).ChildOptions.OperatingMode = 
                (OperatingMode)Enum.Parse(typeof(OperatingMode), value);
        }
    }        
}

The updater in the example checks whether the currently processed node has a legacy OperatingMode property value. If there is such a value, it is assigned to the new OperatingMode property, and the legacy property value is cleared.

Note that since a node updater can be implemented anywhere in the application, the updater should be registered via the ModuleBase.AddModelNodeUpdaters method:

C#
VB
 
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;
using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model.Core;

public sealed partial class MyModule : ModuleBase, IModelNodeUpdater<IModelOptions> {
    //... 
    public override void AddModelNodeUpdaters(IModelNodeUpdaterRegistrator updaterRegistrator) {
        base.AddModelNodeUpdaters(updaterRegistrator);
        updaterRegistrator.AddUpdater<IModelOptions>(this);
    }    
}

以上是关于Convert Application Model Differences的主要内容,如果未能解决你的问题,请参考以下文章

Spring Boot之application.properites的failed to convert java.lang.String to java.lang.Integer问题解决

ImportError:没有名为'tensorflow.contrib.lite.python.tflite_convert'的模块

EF 迁移种子 - 无法创建“Application.Model.TranslationItem”类型的常量值

propel-gen 的“convert-conf”目标失败

Microsoft launches Open Application Model (OAM) and Dapr to ease developments in Kubernetes and micr

Reactive Messaging Patterns with Actor Model — 1 从 Enterprise application说起